Email a colleague    

May 2011

Network Inventory Integrity: Taking Cost Management to a Higher Level

Network Inventory Integrity: Taking Cost Management to a Higher Level

“There is no outside, no inclosing wall, no circumference to us.  A man finishes his story — how good! how final! How it puts a new face on all things! Lo! on the other side rises another man, who draws a circle around the circle we had just pronounced the outline of the sphere.“

—Ralph W.  Emerson, Circles from Essays 1841

If “thinking outside the box“ was important in Emerson’s horse-and-buggy era, you can bet it’s 10 times more important in the age of Facebook and iPads.  To survive in the B/OSS solutions biz, your antenna must be constantly tuned to what telecom customers really need today.  And there’s no time to waste: Competitors are already drawing circles around your existing products.

So imagine you’re a veteran of the network cost management solutions space.  For years you’ve made money converting paper invoices and verifying interconnect invoices for errors.  But now those markets are maturing and it’s time to figure out what to do for a second act.

The scenario I just described is the precise dilemma Razorsight faced in 2009 as it looked to its future.  To bring in some new expertise, Razorsight looked at dozens of potential companies to acquire.  In the end, it selected SingleTusk Solutions, a small telecom analytics company owned and run by Suren Nathan, now Razorsight’s CTO.  Suffice it to say that Razorsight’s “how do I reinvent myself?“ problem has now become Suren’s marching orders.  But does the pressure get to Suren?  Not very much.  In fact, Suren is one of the most upbeat and friendly guys I’ve ever met who’s carrying a sack of stones on his shoulders.

In the interview that follows, Suren walks you through his thought process as he explains the how and why of carving out a new software niche in network-inventory integrity that is contributing to the transformation of Razorsight’s business.

Dan Baker: Suren, moving from financial assurance into the network inventory space seems like quite a stretch.  What’s the rationale for moving in this direction?

Suren Nathan: Dan, you’re right.  At first glance, inventory integrity looks like a leap into something totally different from our heritage business in cost management.  But if you look at an operator’s problems more holistically, it actually fits quite nicely.

Today’s cost-management solutions are mostly driven from a customer perspective.  So they’re good at margin assurance — figuring out if the network leasing costs relative to a particular customer are lower than the actual revenue that customer generates.

That’s fine.  But consider the wireless market where operators are spending huge CAPEX ramping up their backhaul networks via Metro Ethernet.  Well, those backhaul costs are not really customer specific, are they?  Who would you assign those costs to?  It’s actually a big indirect cost.

So here you have a massive network-cost component that traditional cost-management solutions don’t even look at.  And without an accurate and reliable network inventory, most of the analysis and audits from a cost optimization and management perspective won’t deliver the goods.

So what’s Razorsight’s approach to bringing network inventory under a cost management lens?

Well, to begin with, we’re not the first to tackle this issue.  The sector was actually invented by Co-Manage (now Subex) a decade ago.  The way Co-Manage solved the problem was to put probes in the network and reconciling the probe data to the network itself.  That model works well for service providers who own their own networks.  But most every communications provider spends 25 percent-plus of its total revenues on off-net or leased facilities, and they have no way to probe these network elements.

Our approach recognizes the fact that even if the inventory system is the database of record, you have many other peripheral systems — such as ordering and billing — that feed and interact with that inventory.  All those systems have some representation of inventory — circuit IDs, customer addresses and so forth.  Then there are processes like network grooming, data migration, disruptions caused by M&A, that cause network inventory to get out of sync.

So what we do is reconcile the inventory against these multiple sources.  We pull in billing data from Amdocs, Intec, CSG, homegrown and several other systems.  And we access Order Management and Inventory data from systems like Oracle Metasolv or NEC Netcracker.  And we take a feed from a CRM data such as Siebel.  So all of this provides the unified and reconciled inventory view which can be used by many organizations in the telecom.  For instance, using this approach, it now becomes realistic to reconcile repeatedly — month after month — and that’s a great way to recover stranded assets and stranded capacity.

It must be difficult to sell a system like this.  The buyers are scattered throughout a telecom organization.

Yes, inventory drives a lot of programs: capacity planning, network optimization, network cost management, service assurance, product-line profitability and many others.  We end up selling to multiple groups at the service provider.  Not just finance, but network engineering, marketing and executive groups too.

This is a unique analytics application that’s not part of the order-to-cash stream.  It’s powerful because without it, customers end up logging into multiple systems to get a unified view.  For instance, to get a cost view, they would need to go to a system such as Razorsight or TEOCO, dip into a Telcordia Granite for another view, and maybe an ASR e-bonding system from Synchronoss or Neustar.

So if you’re a network engineer, operations or customer service rep, and someone needs more information on the circuit, you can access the system, punch in a number, and get the full 360-degree view of the circuit.  When was it ordered, who is using it, what are the service end points, and how much is it costing us?

What exactly do you inventory?  And what are the challenges of getting an accurate picture?

We look at all components of the network to include physical and logical elements.  These include ANIs, segments, circuits and attributes of the circuit.  And we also look at certain physical devices like wireless handsets.  Primarily we focus on logical inventory — inventory that dynamically changes over time.

It’s important to monitor a circuit as it gets assigned, provisioned and groomed.  Ethernet introduces many new challenges here.  Circuits like ATM, Frame Relay, DS3 and T1/EI were fairly simple by comparison.  Now Ethernet is a burstable service.  It’s based on bandwidth as opposed to point-to-point connections.  And here’s the challenge: If you’re buying bandwidth from a wholesaler, there are no standards bodies that tell you how to order and bill those.

In a sense, next-gen IP networks are now going through a curing process, not unlike a big vat of cheddar cheese.  IP is a very fluid environment right now, and it will take some time for the standards to settle and solidify.  Yet as an operator, you simply can’t wait because the demand for iPhone and Androids is pushing you to rapidly build out backhaul circuits to support the boost in wireless data traffic.  So what do you do?  If the standards aren’t there, you’re forced to make up rules as you go along with every carrier doing it a different way.  But even if you can simplify things, you’re still talking about individual matrix-based pricing contracts with a lot of variable costs.  Calculating costs is going to make your head spin.  And you can be sure that this confusion will lead to lots of invoice verification headaches.

In short, this is no longer about inventory connectivity.  It’s more about monitoring a highly flexible kind of inventory, requiring a deeper view than has been looked at before.

Suren, I know you’d love to sell this solution to every service provider, but how will an operator know that a solution like this makes sense?

Well, every wireless carrier is migrating to 4G/LTE with an Ethernet backhaul network to support the vast increase in apps and video downloads.  In parallel, they are quickly disconnecting legacy TDM-based networks.

So network migration is perhaps the biggest driver.  When people are disconnecting a lot of circuits, you need to ensure that the transition is handled properly or you’ll be paying dearly for double coverage.  That’s a big challenge.

The second driver is really around mergers and acquisitions.  Telecom mergers are happening all over the place and to truly achieve operational synergies, you need the inventory to be as accurate as possible.

Finally, Suren, something I’ve been meaning to ask you for a long time.  What’s with the SingleTusk name?  It’s a pretty cool name, but what does it mean?

The name SingleTusk is derived from ancient mythology.  The story follows a chronicler, an Elephant, who was offered a chance of a lifetime: to scribe the greatest story ever told.  The key stipulation was that the entire story had to be recorded in one sitting without stopping.  But in the middle of recording the story, the chronicler’s writing tool broke, so rather than stop and lose the opportunity, he broke off his own tusk and used it to finish his deliverable.

I used this theme to coin SingleTusk — a company that was singularly devoted to customer success and wouldn’t stop until the goal was reached.

This article first appeared in Billing and OSS World.

Copyright 2011 Black Swan Telecom Journal

 
Suren Nathan

Suren Nathan

Suren Nathan is an 18-year veteran of telecom and the chief technology officer of Razorsight.  Previously, Suren was a founding partner at SingleTusk solutions, which served many large and small service providers with innovative cost, revenue and margin analytics solutions.  Prior to that he was a co-founder and CTO of Step 9 Software, selling order management to CLECs.

Razorsight provides SaaS business intelligence and profit analytics for the communications industry, managing both the buy side and sell side of carrier-to-carrier relationships.

Black Swan Solution Guides & Papers

cSwans of a Feather

  • Network Asset Choreography: Subex Teaches Analytics to Dance with Discovery & Life Cycle Management interview with John Brooks — Network provisioning and asset life cycle management is a foreign world to most business assurance professionals because it’s a domain that lives outside the order-to-cash stream.  This article explains how new analytics and network discovery techniques are enabling operators to better track assets, plan capacity, and pave the way for strategic network deployments and decommissioning.
  • Wireless Backhaul: Preparing for the Cleanup When the Dust Settles by Charlie Thomas — Wireless backhaul represents perhaps the largest telecom build-out in the last decade.  This article lays out a strategy for operators as they sooner or later must groom, optimize and re-engineer their backhaul networks based on actual capacity needs, new pricing and improved supplier agreements.  The article lays out a 6-point plan for ensuring success.
  • Real-Time Network Intelligence: The New Way to Read Telecom Tea Leaves by Suren Nathan — Real-time network intelligence is the key to deciding which products to launch, whose facilities to lease, and where to route traffic.  The article explains why telecoms — and especially enhanced service providers --  should ideally be equipped with both a fine-grained margin analysis solution and a SaaS platform, offering an upgrade path that requires no internat IT support.
  • Network Inventory Integrity: Taking Cost Management to a Higher Level interview with Suren Nathan — Recovering stranded assets and capacity is essential for minimizing CAPEX and leasing costs.  This article makes the case for reconciling network inventory through the many ordering, billing, and other systems that interact with that inventory.

Related Articles

  • Black Swan Guide: Araxxe’s Revenue Assurance Consulting, Testing, and High Definition Billing Analysis Service by Dan Baker — How Araxxe’s end-to-end revenue assurance complements switch-to-bill RA  through telescope RA (external and partner data) and microscope RA (high-definition analysis of complex services like bundling and digital services).
  • Subex’s IDcentral Monetizes Telco & Enterprise Data to Deliver Digital ID & Risk Metric Services for Financing, KYC & More interview with Shankar Roddam — A new digital intelligence service that monetizes the idle data of telecoms and enterprises while also earning a good return for the owner of the data.
  • Opportunities & Obstacles: Consultant Luke Taylor Muses on the State of the Telecom Risk Assurance Business interview with Luke Taylor — A rambling discussion on the state of the risk assurance business with Luke Taylor, independent consultant in telecom revenue/fraud assurance and solution requirements and marketing.
  • LATRO’s Tips for Launching a Successful Revenue & Fraud Assurance Program for Mobile Money Operations in Developing Countries interview with Don Reinhart — A company building mobile money RA/FM tools and  managed services gives a concise, but detailed tutorial on how the Mobile Money Ecosystem works.  Revenue assurance pros will get tips on  what to look for in analytics/assurance tools, controls, and professional services.
  • A WeDo Conference Talk: Consulting & Analytics: Improving your Business Today, Enhancing it Tomorrow interview with Carla Cardoso & Bernado Lucas & Thomas Steagall — Leading risk management consultants explain their mission and walk-through RA, subscription fraud, and collections cases.  They also explain how analytics and machine learning can supplement process optimization.
  • PrologMobile’s Simple and Brilliant Plan to Save US MNOs Billions a Year in Recovered Phones & Retained Customers interview with Seth Heine — An expert in the mobile phone reverse supply chain explains how MNOs — via a neutral third party information exchange — can recover their original phones on the used market and save huge sums in multi-year customer retention.
  • WeDo Explores the IoT Ecosystem in Search of Tomorrow’s Pivotal Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions interview with Carlos Marques — A veteran product manager scans the IoT terrain, discusses key fraud and assurance challenges, and explains the preparatory steps WeDo is taking to become a key player in this emerging market.
  • New Report: Telecom Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions, Services & Strategies by Dan Baker & Luke Taylor & Colin Yates — TRI publishes a new market research report, Telecom Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions, Services & Strategies.  Free executive summary available.
  • Subex Juggles a Wide Variety of Business Assurance and Big Data Analytics Use Cases interview with Rohit Maheshwari — A expert in business assurance solutions explains top use cases such as: IoT security, big data analytics/AI, network asset optimization, multi-player gaming assurance, onboarding mobile subs, and AI customer analytics.
  • MTN Agility: Mastering Exponential Technologies in Revenue/Fraud Assurance and Beyond interview with Danie Maritz & Tony Sani & Luke Taylor — An in-depth look at RAFM operations and innovation at the MTN Group.  Topics discussed include RA/fraud control challenges, strategies, and MTN’s journey to exploit exponential tech (AI, robotics, and ML) in its RAFM program and support of internal non-telco businesses.
  • From Byzantine Software Contracts to Simple & Flexible RA Managed Services interview with Philippe Orsini — Is the way B2B/enterprise software is sold and delivered today progressive — or is it Byzantine in the age of cloud?  An expert lays out the case for managed services in RA and billing verification.
  • Premiere Experts Set to Speak at Summer RAG Conference in London, July 7th and 8th by Dan Baker — The Risk and Assurance Group (RAG) has announced that its 2016 summer conference will expand into a two-day event and feature many premiere experts. 
  • WeDo Hosts Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management Conference in Washington DC by Dan Baker — Black Swan is pleased to announce what looks to be a first class revenue assurance and fraud management conference being put on by WeDo Technologies, on October 1st and 2nd in beautiful Washington DC.
  • Test Call Generators: An Essential Test & Debugging Tool in Mobile Billing Assurance interview with Steffen Öftring — An “active” test call generator (TCG) can see problems that a “passive” revenue assurance system is blind to.  Here’s a discussion on the test call RA  process, over-the-air calls versus core call injection, and test call networks in global roaming RA.
  • The Revenue Assurance Game: How the Rules Change in the Era of IoT & Mobile Broadband interview with Rene Felber & Gadi Solotorevsky — Revenue assurance is perhaps the hardest of telecom functions to define because the term is used in so many different senses.  This discussion on the evolving role of revenue assurance was catalyzed by a survey of experts in the profession.
  • Day in the Life of a Revenue Assurance Analyst interview with Michael Lazarou — Revenue assurance is much more than a software category.  It’s individual analysts struggling to help their larger organizations get a handle on system errors and coordination problems.  In this interview, an analyst reveals the many challenges of getting the revenue assurance job done at a small GSM operator in Europe.
  • Revenue Assurance: History and New Beginnings in RA Maturity interview with Daniela Giacomantonio & Gadi Solotorevsky — The Roman Forum was the center of commercial life in ancient Rome.  Now, two millennia later, the Forum lives on in the exchange of ideas across countless professions and  media.  In this interview, two Revenue Assurance experts discuss both the new RA Maturity initiative of the TM Forum and the value of telco/solution vendor collaboration.
  • Migrating systems or launching LTE next year?  Don‘t forget transformation assurance & optimisation by Efrat Nissimov — System transformations and network migrations are major  revenue impacting events and they should raise a big red flag.  Why?  Because data integrity issues are bound to crop up as CSPs move vital data from a legacy system to something new.  It’s time for transformation assurance.
  • How can Cable/DSL Internet Providers Meet the Usage-Based Billing Mandate? interview with Ryan Guthrie — The popularity of YouTube, Netflix, and Hulu other video outlets has turned the tables on service profitability for cable/DSL service providers.  Many are moving to usage-based billing, but that largely unprepared for the revenue assurance aspects of this move.  This interview explains the technical challenge and points to solutions in billing, speed caps, and traffic revenue monitoring.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance: How Rural LECs can Recover $284 Million in Revenue Shortfalls interview with Kelly Cannon & Darrell Merschak — Independent rural LECs in the U.S. still rely on the AMA/EMI billing formats for CABS billing, even as that format has proven to be highly inaccurate as a source of inter-carrier records.  This interview includes an analysis and discussion of revenue recovery techniques ILECs can use by leveraging SS7 probes.  Also discussed are billing strategies, traffic dumping threats, and the possible fallout from the FCC’s bill-and-keep mandate.
  • Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team interview with Kathleen Romano — Business assurance (BA) skills have wide applicability outside the revenue assurance and fraud mangement domains.  In this article, a telecom executive explains how she’s applying her BA skills in the Payments area.  In addition to discussing the key operational challenges in Payments, the interview also provides keen insights on setting goals in business assurance, leading a team, and making critical decisions.
  • LTE Rollout: Make it a Smashing Success with Risk Assessment, Controls, and Marketing Offer Analytics by Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfuly plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This article lays out a 3-phase tactical guide on  how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • RA Prevention: How to Manage Revenue Risks and Communicate RA’s Value to Senior Execs by Shaul Moav — The era of revenue assurance prevention and risk assessment is here.  Several of the mature operators of the world have developed their own methodologies and tools.  Using firefighting and fire prevention as a metaphor, the article details a new commercial software approach explaining the goals, method of risk evaluation, and senior executive dashboards developed for the process.
  • Precision Clockworks: How Revenue Assurance Synchronizes with the Business at Swisscom interview with Marco Pollinger — An expert revenue assurance department is one whose work dovetails well with the lines of businesses it supports.  In this interview you’ll learn how Swisscom manages its revenue assurance function for maximum effect.  The article discusses: the operator’s innovative RA organization, the screening and RA approval of new services, its pre-production bill audits, and its coordination with corporate risk management.
  • Versatile, Portable & Corrections-Savvy: Quest for the Swiss Army Knife of Revenue Assurance Software by Mark Yelland — Revenue assurance maturity models are not cast in stone.  Since  best practices will change over time, it’s healthy to explore moving maturity models forward.  For example, great gains have been made in leakage detection, but RA corrections has been harder to master.  The author dreams about seven functions that should ideally come together in a single all-purpose revenue assurance software tool.
  • Bringing Strategic Planning & Value Engineering to Revenue Assurance interview with Maged Fawzy — Engineering and architectural techniques have a role in revenue assurance.  This interview with a top Egyptian RA consultant explains how continuous risk assessment and long range — yet flexible — RA planning can sharpen a carrier’s RA program and lead to better use of revenue assurance software and integration services.
  • Forensic Fossils: Is Your Revenue Assurance Shop Fit for Display at a Natural History Museum? interview with Jim Marsh — Without the continuous guiding light of seasoned revenue assurance leaders, even the best teams of RA professionals, technology, and business processes can fossilize and lose their vitality.
  • Revenue Assurance: The Magical Market Cap Multiplier by Van Howard & Curtis Mills — Many operators today consider revenue assurance yesterday’s opportunity.  But this article shows why significant revenue and cost leakage can still go undetected, even in companies with dedicated RA departments.  Also discussed are the benefits of a broader or more “forensic” approach to revenue assurance, an approach that boosts the bottom line regardless of the automated tools already in place.
  • From Risk to Robust: Turning the Big Picture Into a Real Agenda for Change in Telecoms by Eric Priezkalns — Inspired by a Financial Times article written by Nassim Taleb, author of “The Black Swan”, here is an insightful and entertaining primer on telecom risk management.  The article takes ten risk management lessons from Taleb and applies them specifically to the communications industry.  You’ll learn about the value of small scale trials, organization accountability, cures for a blame culture, incentives that work, the power of simplicity, and more.
  • Synthesizing the Telecom Business Assurance Practice With the Analytics World by Dan Baker — Business assurance is a wrapper term that allows you to draw a circle around various telecom assurance, control, and optimization activities.  This article maps business assurance as a subset of telecom analytics, constrasting it with marketing analytics while a diagram shows where biz assurance fits in the larger B/OSS world.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win by Cheryl Smith Rardin & David West — Revenue assurance innovation is far easier when partners cooperate to make it happen.  This articles shows how a U.S. operator, software vendor, and consultant teamed to develop a breakthrough in Carrier Access Billing (CABS) assurance.  Learn about: the dispute resolution data gap that needed to be filled, the partnering strategy, the implementation challenges, and payback results.
  • Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software? interview with Sergio Luis Silvestre — Business controls software, originally developed for RA, is finding application in other areas of the business such as internal audit, collections, security and risk management.  This article argues that “business assurance” is the best term to describe this broader set of  controls software that can find a home in numerous departments or functions of a CSP’s business.
  • PwC on the Business of Revenue Assurance Consulting & Mentoring interview with Tim Banks & Dan Stevens — Revenue assurance consulting firms offer a broad range of services to clients these days.  The article explains the practice of mentoring RA mangers and providing a CFO with visibility on the status of an operator’s business controls.  Perspective is also offered on the value of RA software and the opportunity to broaden the RA practice scope.
  • Robots for Hire: Verifying Accuracy In the Age of Complex Mobile Billing/Charging interview with Xavier Lesage — As real-time charging and complex lifestyle calling plans gain credence across the globe in wireless, billing quality issues will rise in importance.  This article discusses a unique managed services approach to invoice testing and roaming fraud protection that checks results against advertised or published source data for the utmost accuracy.
  • Ericsson: Revenue Assurance Consulting With an NGN Flavor interview with Thomas Steagall — Helping operators detect billing and provisioning problem is merely table stakes in the RA services business these days.  The article discuss why operators need to ramp up their RA function with service experience and group-wide financial health monitoring.  Advise is also offered on: key RA maturity questions, risk-and-reward contracts, and how to extract greater value from software investments.
  • Do-It-Yourself RA for Small Operators and MVNOs interview with Mark Yelland — Budget-minded small operators and MVNOs are no longer hamstrung in RA capability anymore.  This article offers high-leverage strategies for operators who cannot afford expensive RA software tools.  With  data access, brains, and a DIY philosophy, any small operator can map a  path to greater RA savings, maturity, and program growth.
  • Revenue Assurance Maturity: Report From the Arena interview with Eric Nelson — Revenue assurance maturity can‘t be easily computed.  How do you  compare the KPIs of Comcast billing with that of mobile money RA in Western Africa?  Even still, this article offers some universal RA wisdom from a straight-shooting veteran of carriers large and small.  Topics discussed include: dashboard or process, COTS vs. inhouse solutions, and tips on gaining internal support for the RA practice.