Email a colleague    

April 2013

Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team

Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt
the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.

George Bernard Shaw, English Playwright

The software tools and best practices needed to tackle operational problems are getting better all the time.  Yet whether or not a carrier organization makes actual progress depends largely on the resourcefulness and drive of a few dedicated business assurance (BA) professionals and teams.

Striving for operational excellence is not an easy road however.  BA warriors are up against a lot because the larger organization usually has other, “more urgent” priorities to spend money on.

Yet I’m convinced that our industry’s climate change towards higher service complexity, fresh business models, and a greater reliance on analytic skills is a perfect environment for BA professionals to thrive.

Not convinced?  I’ll admit that the opinion of an industry observer like me is at best second-hand, but when the career of a telecom executive kind of proves the point, well, that’s much more convincing.

When we last interviewed Kathy Romano, she had the very challenging job of heading up revenue assurance for Verizon’s FiOS service.  Under her direction, Verizon broke new ground in RA by proactively catching and resolving errors in the narrow window between the billing cycle’s end and the actual sending of invoices to customers.

But last year, Kathy left her RA post to head up Verizon’s Payments.  Always one to love a new challenge, she got her wish because the new job is an awesome responsibility that cuts across the entire Verizon business: wireless, wireline, consumer, business, everything.

Learning about the many operational challenges in Payments is a key take-away from this interview.  But just as interesting, I think, is hearing Kathy’s insights on setting goals, leading her team, and making critical decisions.  These are lessons that apply to a host of back office problems.  Enjoy.

Dan Baker: Kathy, it’s great to connect with you again.  It would be wonderful if you could first give us some insight on some of the key challenges in the payments area.

Kathy Romano: Dan, it’s actually a fascinating area because most people think payments are so simple, but they really aren‘t.

In my world, I’ve got payments coming in from hundreds of different sources whether it be somebody mailing a check, paying on our website, paying on their bank’s website, paying at a Verizon retail location, or maybe walking up to an independent third-party collection agent.

So as these payments come in from all different directions, there’s a myriad of systems those payments need to get to.  At Verizon, you’re talking multiple billing systems, some with multiple instances.

Now if the customer gives us a payment stub or document with the right account number on it, fine, it’s pretty straightforward.  But anything else is a guessing game to some extent because you are trying to figure out what the customer intended.

On the backend, if something happens and the payment doesn‘t get applied in the normal course of business, the next best action to be taken is to initiate a payment investigation and apply the payment correctly, and as quickly as possible.

So, we are looking to manage all these processes.  The other side of it is recurring payments.  For instance, a customer sets up payments to be taken out of her account every month.  The way it works in our system is that flows off an order.  So, just like in revenue assurance, if the order process was flawed, incorrect information can have a ripple effect.

I can imagine that there are lots of moving parts in the payment area: lots of opportunities to improve processes, but tell me: is there a particular area you’re been really keen to focus on?

Well, certainly one of the big initiatives I’m driving is a more flexible front-end payments platform that makes movements between billing systems more efficient.

Here’s the issue.  Historically when a payment is received, it’s matched to a particular system and a lock box address is set up saying that payment X is meant for billing system Y.

Now the complications come because we are a big company with many different businesses.  Our customers view each business unit at Verizon as seamlessly connected with Verizon the parent company.  So they will often mix their payments methods and send us payments without account IDs, convinced that Verizon can easily figure it all out.

And I guess that’s the price of being a big company.  We can‘t expect our customers to understand the complicated processes going on behind the scenes.  But, if anything, the variety of payment options will increase, not decrease, in the future, so we need a better way to allow customers to pay us any way they like, and for us to be able to identify and get payments to where they belong.

Take our large business customers as an example.  They will make a single payment that’s meant to be applied across, say, three or four billing systems, but in today’s world when the payment comes in, it’s applied to only one lock box.  Then, later on, somebody needs to go in manually to separate the payments and send them to the correct places.

That method doesn‘t work for me.  That is not the way we want to operate.  So we have designed a system that will be built over the next couple of years that takes the payment processing out of the billing systems and raises it to an upper layer so that the payment can come into that level and go to whatever billing systems it needs to without having it first mapped to an individual billing system.

This approach gives us much greater flexibility.  We will no longer need four people doing manual hand-offs that reverse it in one system and then journalize it in the other.  The new system will basically dip down, pull something out, and drop it down into the next room of this common platform.

And it gives you better visibility to see every payment that’s been taken in across the business.  That’s hugely powerful because when there are customer issues around payments, you can do automated searches instead of having people look through a bunch of systems to figure out what happened.

Kathy, a lot of Black Swan readers are in revenue assurance.  And knowing that’s where you hailed from, I’m sure many of them are curious how transferable your RA skills were to payments.

To me, I’m more or less filling a similar role.  Having a skill and background in revenue assurance brings two key things to the table.  First, you understand systems, how they work, and where the risks are inside the system processes.

And second, you learn to control the customer experience through those kinds of techniques.  What we do is still all back office.  So I am not worried about whether we are talking to the customer the right way.  But what I am concerned about is responding quickly enough to a customer’s concern.

When a customer calls us with a problem that flows back to my back office team via a ticket, I want to be sure we keep the customer informed.  But if we take 10 days to reconcile a customer’s issue and we don‘t inform him of the status as we go, you can bet the customer is going to keep calling back which costs the company money.  So, if we can turn it around within a day and at the end, notify him that it is done, we’re not only delivering better service, we are actually saving the money we lose whenever the customer calls back repeatedly to find out the status.

What about revenue assurance tools.  Can you use those in Payments?

Yes, revenue assurance tools are very applicable in payments because we do a ton of reconciliation.  When you get a payment in one place, you’ve got to look where to apply it to an account and you’ve got to look for it in your bank deposit.  Anytime you are try to match record-to-record and look for exceptions, the revenue assurance tools are perfect for that.

Anything that is bottom-up, where you are trying to match record-to-record, the record gets to all of the places that you needed it to go.  Those are the places where it makes sense to use the revenue assurance tools.  Now at Verizon we’ve got tens of millions of payments every month, so with those volumes, RA systems make a lot of sense.

I had a great interview with Eric Priezkalns recently with the title, Mishandle my Telecom Career and his point was that people need to stretch themselves a bit -- even add a little positive stress to their work environment to promote some professional growth.  It’s another way of stating that Verizon motto I love: ‘Make progress every day.“

In any large organization, there are people who are afraid of change.  Positive things are happening here at Verizon.  The new attitude here is that change isn‘t negative.  In fact, change can actually energize your organization to grow and make things better.

One of the big issues with change is that many of the issues seem too big — they look insurmountable.  Yet I tell my team: consider the possibilities.  Consider all these things you have been complaining about forever.  Well, what if we can find a way to fix at least some of them, wouldn‘t that be great?

But even though you know the results you gain will be achieved step by step, you need to pursue a larger vision.  You need to define what you perceive as an ideal cure to problems.  Move as close to that ideal as possible, within reasonable cost constraints, of course.

You don‘t say: “Let me change a little bit here and a little bit there”.  To me, you have to define your full vision.  You have to define where you are trying to go because if you don’t, it’s not going to happen.

So I am very clear with my team that we will not spend money on little things.  We are building towards the strategy.  If there is a little thing that builds towards your strategy, that’s fine.  But we are not going to waste money on little things that improve productivity in small amounts: we need to move toward the larger goal.

How much of what you’re trying to achieve is around getting your hands on new systems and automating lots of things?

Automation and systems are a big part of what we do, but you also need to optimize your processes.  You have to find that fine balance between where you need human beings involved and where you can do things systematically.

Let me give you an example.  In this past year, we have replaced all the systems that process check payments received in the mail.  Now the vendor we selected for the new system had a piece of software to automatically read the dollar amount on the check.  And the idea behind this software feature, of course, was to reduce the number of people doing manual entry because the standard procedure was to key in the amount two times to increase accuracy.

So saving data entry people sounded great, but when we tested the automated check reader, we found that if the dollar sign on the check was misaligned, it would sometimes pick up the date number instead of the true dollar amount.

Now the vendor’s attitude was: “Well, in any automated system you are going to have some occasional error.” But I knew that using such a system could lead to major customer issues downstream.  After all, the date has no relationship at all to the dollar amount so the discrepancies are liable to be huge.

Here’s the point.  If I was only concerned with optimizing the check processing piece, a check reader that produced “occasional errors” may have been acceptable.  But looking at the payment process end-to-end perspective, I knew it would have been a big mistake.

Seems like that rule applies to many back office operations.  Doing the right thing entails putting yourself in the shoes of the customer.

Yes, and I’m not saying our Payments systems and processes are perfect.  Sometimes we don‘t always understand what the customer really intended based on what is sent to us.  And data entry keyers make mistakes too.  That’s why we key check entries twice, but if somebody can’t read it well the first time, it can also be misread twice.  It happens.

The Payments area is like Payroll: if anything goes wrong, it turns into a big issue quickly.  Conversely, when you’re doing your job well, nobody notices that you’re even there.

In the meantime, there’s a lot of optimizing work to be done, so I’m loving the fact that I’m busy and have a lot on my plate.  It really is a lot of fun.

Copyright 2013 Black Swan Telecom Journal

Kathleen Romano

Kathleen Romano

As Executive Director — Bill Print, Payment and AR Operations at Verizon, Kathy manages the processing and application of incoming customer payments for both the Wireline and Wireless segments of Verizon as well as Bill Printing for Verizon Wireline.

In her prior role, Kathy was responsible for the complete planning, implementation and execution of Verizon’s Retail Revenue Assurance strategy.

During her 34 year career with Verizon and predecessor companies, Kathy has had a wide range of experience across the business in areas such as product line management, engineering, human resources, finance, IT, billing operations, revenue assurance and others, resulting in a significant knowledge base and industry leading vision especially in the  Bill to Cash space.  Kathy received her degree in Mathematics and Business Administration from Gettysburg College.

Black Swan Solution Guides & Papers

cSwans of a Feather

Related Articles

  • Black Swan Guide: Araxxe’s Revenue Assurance Consulting, Testing, and High Definition Billing Analysis Service by Dan Baker — How Araxxe’s end-to-end revenue assurance complements switch-to-bill RA  through telescope RA (external and partner data) and microscope RA (high-definition analysis of complex services like bundling and digital services).
  • Subex’s IDcentral Monetizes Telco & Enterprise Data to Deliver Digital ID & Risk Metric Services for Financing, KYC & More interview with Shankar Roddam — A new digital intelligence service that monetizes the idle data of telecoms and enterprises while also earning a good return for the owner of the data.
  • Opportunities & Obstacles: Consultant Luke Taylor Muses on the State of the Telecom Risk Assurance Business interview with Luke Taylor — A rambling discussion on the state of the risk assurance business with Luke Taylor, independent consultant in telecom revenue/fraud assurance and solution requirements and marketing.
  • LATRO’s Tips for Launching a Successful Revenue & Fraud Assurance Program for Mobile Money Operations in Developing Countries interview with Don Reinhart — A company building mobile money RA/FM tools and  managed services gives a concise, but detailed tutorial on how the Mobile Money Ecosystem works.  Revenue assurance pros will get tips on  what to look for in analytics/assurance tools, controls, and professional services.
  • A WeDo Conference Talk: Consulting & Analytics: Improving your Business Today, Enhancing it Tomorrow interview with Carla Cardoso & Bernado Lucas & Thomas Steagall — Leading risk management consultants explain their mission and walk-through RA, subscription fraud, and collections cases.  They also explain how analytics and machine learning can supplement process optimization.
  • PrologMobile’s Simple and Brilliant Plan to Save US MNOs Billions a Year in Recovered Phones & Retained Customers interview with Seth Heine — An expert in the mobile phone reverse supply chain explains how MNOs — via a neutral third party information exchange — can recover their original phones on the used market and save huge sums in multi-year customer retention.
  • WeDo Explores the IoT Ecosystem in Search of Tomorrow’s Pivotal Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions interview with Carlos Marques — A veteran product manager scans the IoT terrain, discusses key fraud and assurance challenges, and explains the preparatory steps WeDo is taking to become a key player in this emerging market.
  • New Report: Telecom Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions, Services & Strategies by Dan Baker & Luke Taylor & Colin Yates — TRI publishes a new market research report, Telecom Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions, Services & Strategies.  Free executive summary available.
  • Subex Juggles a Wide Variety of Business Assurance and Big Data Analytics Use Cases interview with Rohit Maheshwari — A expert in business assurance solutions explains top use cases such as: IoT security, big data analytics/AI, network asset optimization, multi-player gaming assurance, onboarding mobile subs, and AI customer analytics.
  • MTN Agility: Mastering Exponential Technologies in Revenue/Fraud Assurance and Beyond interview with Danie Maritz & Tony Sani & Luke Taylor — An in-depth look at RAFM operations and innovation at the MTN Group.  Topics discussed include RA/fraud control challenges, strategies, and MTN’s journey to exploit exponential tech (AI, robotics, and ML) in its RAFM program and support of internal non-telco businesses.
  • From Byzantine Software Contracts to Simple & Flexible RA Managed Services interview with Philippe Orsini — Is the way B2B/enterprise software is sold and delivered today progressive — or is it Byzantine in the age of cloud?  An expert lays out the case for managed services in RA and billing verification.
  • Premiere Experts Set to Speak at Summer RAG Conference in London, July 7th and 8th by Dan Baker — The Risk and Assurance Group (RAG) has announced that its 2016 summer conference will expand into a two-day event and feature many premiere experts. 
  • WeDo Hosts Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management Conference in Washington DC by Dan Baker — Black Swan is pleased to announce what looks to be a first class revenue assurance and fraud management conference being put on by WeDo Technologies, on October 1st and 2nd in beautiful Washington DC.
  • Test Call Generators: An Essential Test & Debugging Tool in Mobile Billing Assurance interview with Steffen Öftring — An “active” test call generator (TCG) can see problems that a “passive” revenue assurance system is blind to.  Here’s a discussion on the test call RA  process, over-the-air calls versus core call injection, and test call networks in global roaming RA.
  • The Revenue Assurance Game: How the Rules Change in the Era of IoT & Mobile Broadband interview with Rene Felber & Gadi Solotorevsky — Revenue assurance is perhaps the hardest of telecom functions to define because the term is used in so many different senses.  This discussion on the evolving role of revenue assurance was catalyzed by a survey of experts in the profession.
  • Day in the Life of a Revenue Assurance Analyst interview with Michael Lazarou — Revenue assurance is much more than a software category.  It’s individual analysts struggling to help their larger organizations get a handle on system errors and coordination problems.  In this interview, an analyst reveals the many challenges of getting the revenue assurance job done at a small GSM operator in Europe.
  • Revenue Assurance: History and New Beginnings in RA Maturity interview with Daniela Giacomantonio & Gadi Solotorevsky — The Roman Forum was the center of commercial life in ancient Rome.  Now, two millennia later, the Forum lives on in the exchange of ideas across countless professions and  media.  In this interview, two Revenue Assurance experts discuss both the new RA Maturity initiative of the TM Forum and the value of telco/solution vendor collaboration.
  • Migrating systems or launching LTE next year?  Don‘t forget transformation assurance & optimisation by Efrat Nissimov — System transformations and network migrations are major  revenue impacting events and they should raise a big red flag.  Why?  Because data integrity issues are bound to crop up as CSPs move vital data from a legacy system to something new.  It’s time for transformation assurance.
  • How can Cable/DSL Internet Providers Meet the Usage-Based Billing Mandate? interview with Ryan Guthrie — The popularity of YouTube, Netflix, and Hulu other video outlets has turned the tables on service profitability for cable/DSL service providers.  Many are moving to usage-based billing, but that largely unprepared for the revenue assurance aspects of this move.  This interview explains the technical challenge and points to solutions in billing, speed caps, and traffic revenue monitoring.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance: How Rural LECs can Recover $284 Million in Revenue Shortfalls interview with Kelly Cannon & Darrell Merschak — Independent rural LECs in the U.S. still rely on the AMA/EMI billing formats for CABS billing, even as that format has proven to be highly inaccurate as a source of inter-carrier records.  This interview includes an analysis and discussion of revenue recovery techniques ILECs can use by leveraging SS7 probes.  Also discussed are billing strategies, traffic dumping threats, and the possible fallout from the FCC’s bill-and-keep mandate.
  • Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team interview with Kathleen Romano — Business assurance (BA) skills have wide applicability outside the revenue assurance and fraud mangement domains.  In this article, a telecom executive explains how she’s applying her BA skills in the Payments area.  In addition to discussing the key operational challenges in Payments, the interview also provides keen insights on setting goals in business assurance, leading a team, and making critical decisions.
  • LTE Rollout: Make it a Smashing Success with Risk Assessment, Controls, and Marketing Offer Analytics by Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfuly plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This article lays out a 3-phase tactical guide on  how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • RA Prevention: How to Manage Revenue Risks and Communicate RA’s Value to Senior Execs by Shaul Moav — The era of revenue assurance prevention and risk assessment is here.  Several of the mature operators of the world have developed their own methodologies and tools.  Using firefighting and fire prevention as a metaphor, the article details a new commercial software approach explaining the goals, method of risk evaluation, and senior executive dashboards developed for the process.
  • Precision Clockworks: How Revenue Assurance Synchronizes with the Business at Swisscom interview with Marco Pollinger — An expert revenue assurance department is one whose work dovetails well with the lines of businesses it supports.  In this interview you’ll learn how Swisscom manages its revenue assurance function for maximum effect.  The article discusses: the operator’s innovative RA organization, the screening and RA approval of new services, its pre-production bill audits, and its coordination with corporate risk management.
  • Versatile, Portable & Corrections-Savvy: Quest for the Swiss Army Knife of Revenue Assurance Software by Mark Yelland — Revenue assurance maturity models are not cast in stone.  Since  best practices will change over time, it’s healthy to explore moving maturity models forward.  For example, great gains have been made in leakage detection, but RA corrections has been harder to master.  The author dreams about seven functions that should ideally come together in a single all-purpose revenue assurance software tool.
  • Bringing Strategic Planning & Value Engineering to Revenue Assurance interview with Maged Fawzy — Engineering and architectural techniques have a role in revenue assurance.  This interview with a top Egyptian RA consultant explains how continuous risk assessment and long range — yet flexible — RA planning can sharpen a carrier’s RA program and lead to better use of revenue assurance software and integration services.
  • Forensic Fossils: Is Your Revenue Assurance Shop Fit for Display at a Natural History Museum? interview with Jim Marsh — Without the continuous guiding light of seasoned revenue assurance leaders, even the best teams of RA professionals, technology, and business processes can fossilize and lose their vitality.
  • Revenue Assurance: The Magical Market Cap Multiplier by Van Howard & Curtis Mills — Many operators today consider revenue assurance yesterday’s opportunity.  But this article shows why significant revenue and cost leakage can still go undetected, even in companies with dedicated RA departments.  Also discussed are the benefits of a broader or more “forensic” approach to revenue assurance, an approach that boosts the bottom line regardless of the automated tools already in place.
  • From Risk to Robust: Turning the Big Picture Into a Real Agenda for Change in Telecoms by Eric Priezkalns — Inspired by a Financial Times article written by Nassim Taleb, author of “The Black Swan”, here is an insightful and entertaining primer on telecom risk management.  The article takes ten risk management lessons from Taleb and applies them specifically to the communications industry.  You’ll learn about the value of small scale trials, organization accountability, cures for a blame culture, incentives that work, the power of simplicity, and more.
  • Synthesizing the Telecom Business Assurance Practice With the Analytics World by Dan Baker — Business assurance is a wrapper term that allows you to draw a circle around various telecom assurance, control, and optimization activities.  This article maps business assurance as a subset of telecom analytics, constrasting it with marketing analytics while a diagram shows where biz assurance fits in the larger B/OSS world.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win by Cheryl Smith Rardin & David West — Revenue assurance innovation is far easier when partners cooperate to make it happen.  This articles shows how a U.S. operator, software vendor, and consultant teamed to develop a breakthrough in Carrier Access Billing (CABS) assurance.  Learn about: the dispute resolution data gap that needed to be filled, the partnering strategy, the implementation challenges, and payback results.
  • Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software? interview with Sergio Luis Silvestre — Business controls software, originally developed for RA, is finding application in other areas of the business such as internal audit, collections, security and risk management.  This article argues that “business assurance” is the best term to describe this broader set of  controls software that can find a home in numerous departments or functions of a CSP’s business.
  • PwC on the Business of Revenue Assurance Consulting & Mentoring interview with Tim Banks & Dan Stevens — Revenue assurance consulting firms offer a broad range of services to clients these days.  The article explains the practice of mentoring RA mangers and providing a CFO with visibility on the status of an operator’s business controls.  Perspective is also offered on the value of RA software and the opportunity to broaden the RA practice scope.
  • Robots for Hire: Verifying Accuracy In the Age of Complex Mobile Billing/Charging interview with Xavier Lesage — As real-time charging and complex lifestyle calling plans gain credence across the globe in wireless, billing quality issues will rise in importance.  This article discusses a unique managed services approach to invoice testing and roaming fraud protection that checks results against advertised or published source data for the utmost accuracy.
  • Ericsson: Revenue Assurance Consulting With an NGN Flavor interview with Thomas Steagall — Helping operators detect billing and provisioning problem is merely table stakes in the RA services business these days.  The article discuss why operators need to ramp up their RA function with service experience and group-wide financial health monitoring.  Advise is also offered on: key RA maturity questions, risk-and-reward contracts, and how to extract greater value from software investments.
  • Do-It-Yourself RA for Small Operators and MVNOs interview with Mark Yelland — Budget-minded small operators and MVNOs are no longer hamstrung in RA capability anymore.  This article offers high-leverage strategies for operators who cannot afford expensive RA software tools.  With  data access, brains, and a DIY philosophy, any small operator can map a  path to greater RA savings, maturity, and program growth.
  • Revenue Assurance Maturity: Report From the Arena interview with Eric Nelson — Revenue assurance maturity can‘t be easily computed.  How do you  compare the KPIs of Comcast billing with that of mobile money RA in Western Africa?  Even still, this article offers some universal RA wisdom from a straight-shooting veteran of carriers large and small.  Topics discussed include: dashboard or process, COTS vs. inhouse solutions, and tips on gaining internal support for the RA practice.