Email a colleague    

April 2015

Will Real-Time Decisioning Save Big Data Analytics from Overblown Hype?

Will Real-Time Decisioning Save Big Data Analytics from Overblown Hype?

IT is best seen as the latest in a series of broadly adopted technologies that have reshaped industry — from the steam engine and the railroad to the telegraph and the telephone to the electric generator and the internal combustion engine. . .  All these technologies opened opportunities for forward-looking companies to gain real advantages.  But as their availability increased and their cost decreased — as they became ubiquitous — they became commodity inputs.
      Nicholas Carr, IT Doesn’t Matter, Harvard Business Review, 2003

When the article above first appeared, it caused quite a stir in the IT community.  The story was widely trounced as idiocy by the IT pundits of the time. “Imagine”, they said, “comparing computers to steam engines and the telegraph.”

But love him or hate him, Carr raised a key point: there’s nothing magical about information technology.  It’s subject to the same economic laws that rendered telegraph and horse carriage technology obsolete.  In short, innovation and new value creation are essential to ensuring that IT still “matters”.

So let’s get specific.  Which IT systems are strategic to telecom today?  How about billing and CRM?  Well, those are certainly mission-critical.  Ah, but just because something is mission-critical, does that make it strategic?  Lots of other things are mission critical: how about electric lights, heat, air conditioning, and security ID cards?

Let’s turn to analytics.  Is that strategic?  Well, in 2014, I authored a 500+ page analyst report on Telecom Big Data & Analytics.  And in my research I chronicled the work of dozens of companies building dream machines that collect and analyze data.  But scanning the horizon today, I don’t see the big value-creating breakthroughs you’d expect given all the hype there’s been around big data.  So why is that?

Well, one reason, I think, is that succeeding with telecom analytics is more than just collecting and analyzing data.  It’s also about taking action — correct action — often in real-time and across a complex provisioning environment.

Sure, we know that analytics has been quite successful in one-off marketing campaigns.  But to me, the key strategic value comes when you use it to drive day-to-day actions.  It’s about making decisions in context and driving that successfully into the network and back office systems.  That’s what will save analytics and big data from being dissed as high-priced calculators in a world where compute-power is like oxygen.

One company who specializes in this action-oriented, provisioning-friendly aspect of analytics and IT is Pegasystems.  And joining us now to explain his company’s systems and software philosophy is Tom Erskine, head of marketing for its Communications and Media business unit.

Dan Baker: Tom, it would be great if you first explain a little about Pegasystems.  What market and customers do you serve?

Tom Erskine: Dan, our core software platform, Pega 7, is serving a number of different vertical markets like banking, insurance, healthcare, and communications.

In communications, we’ve built a customer experience platform for marketing, sales, ordering, and customer service applications.  And we’ve had some significant success selling this concept into the Tier 1 market.

For instance, Everything Everywhere in the UK uses our marketing applications to retain customers and up-sell/cross-sell.  We also serve providers like Telecom Italia, Orange, Cox, Verizon Wireless, and DirecTV.

What’s unique, I think, is we sell a single platform as opposed to a hodgepodge of acquired technology stitched together with API glue.  It truly is a unified platform that is much faster to develop on and change than standard approaches.

Conventional wisdom says that the systems that support marketing, CRM and customer service are mature and ingrained today.  A Tier 1 operator is not going to make the move to something new unless it’s pretty compelling.  So what are you offering that’s makes a difference?

I think comparing the platform we sell to other offerings on the market will answer your question, Dan.  If you look at a Siebel especially, and even Salesforce to some degree, the applications those companies sell are very data centric.  They are built around a data architecture, not a business process flow.

OK, so why is that distinction important?  Well, it’s kind of the difference between designing an information system versus designing a next best action system.

An information system is good at pulling data from a big database and presenting it to a customer or a customer service rep.  But if you optimize the retrieval of information, your design is less flexible when it comes to modifying the next best actions you want to take.

Now if the customer interaction is simple and the rate of change is slow, then a plain information system is fine.  But when you deal with complex issues such as in B2B and serving enterprise customers, the strategic pivot point is around changing the processes, procedures and policies in that customer interaction.  If you get those right, the data should take care of itself.

Take a wireline customer move.  If the customer wants to move his address, that is a pretty complicated process and so we provide the core ability to handle very complex cases like that easily and much of that expertise stems from our heritage as a BPM shop.

So our philosophy is to get the data you need when you need it versus starting with data as the first premise.  Think about the enterprise space where things get far more complicated.  One order from a large enterprise could drive 1,500 different service orders with it.

Why haven‘t the incumbent vendors developed the same process-centric capabilities that Pega has?

With due respect to my former colleagues at places like Convergys, NetCracker, and at Amdocs and places like that, I think the approach of evolving a software platform through acquisition — and stitching together all the acquired companies into some type of “suite”-- is not the best.  When you scratch the surface of that suite, it ends up being in a lot of integration cost for the customer and not very seamless: it doesn’t drive the best possible customer experience.

Give you an example.  Telstra still has a bunch of Siebel all over the organization, but what they have done is to layer a next generation, more agile layer on top of the core applications like Siebel.  And those applications continue to run.

It’s almost impossible to do a full replacement at a large carrier in our industry.  Why?  Because there is so much legacy and so much data in so many different places.  This is not unique to communications, by the way.  It’s the same in banking, healthcare, insurance, and other industries.  Companies have hundreds of systems with data in them and the challenge is to get the data out and modernize the systems without ripping them out and replacing them.

Can we get into some of the nuts and bolts?  How are changes made in your system?

Basically we allow the business and IT teams to collaborate using visual tools.

The goal is to create an environment where the business and the IT teams work in a much more rapid and agile way to solve problems.

And in that way, you can go from a release every six months to a release maybe every month or two months.  That’s very important in a place like marketing or customer service because that side of the business evolves very fast.

When I worked at Convergys, we were running Time Warner’s and Cox’s billing system.  And those customers would come to us and say, “OK, we are launching a new marketing plan and we need to make X, Y, and Z changes in the system.”

So, we’d say, “Send us your requirements document and in a couple weeks we’ll come back with statement of work, then we’ll design something, come back about a month later and ask: is this design what you’re looking for?” And that sort of iterative approach goes on for months and months, sometimes over a year.

Compare that method with having the business and IT organization define their requirements right in the tool and actually build the application as they go.

The second aspect of this is slightly more technical but it’s around the question of specialization.  How do you enable treating customers in Los Angeles different from the way you treat customers in New York?  The platform allows you to do that very easily without “forking the code” — or having to create a whole new version of the application that says: if the zip code is X, then do Y.

It’s all about taking the next best action — depending on the context.  About five years ago, Pega acquired Chordiant who had pioneered the whole idea of NBA or next best action.

And we have come up with a metaphor to describe this.  It’s called the Situational Layer Cake.  The cake’s base layer is all your company policies and procedures.  And then you add other specialty layers on top: by geography, by product, by customer type, etc.

Pegasystems’ Situational Layer Cake

Pegasystems’ Situational Layer Cake
Click the napkin above to see a 4 minute video on the Situational Layer Cake

Probably the best example of the application’s use is at American Express.  If you call the American Express services organization anywhere in the world, they are running Pega.  The software enables them to treat the customer differently whether it be Australia or New York, but the core application you are running is exactly the same.

Tell me more about this Situational Layer Cake.  How is it being used in telecom?

Well, let’s say I have a Gold customer who speaks Spanish and has a quad play in Los Angeles.  How do I handle that interaction for technical trouble-shooting in the best way?  What sort of agent should handle the call?  And how should these decisions differ from, say, handling a double-play customer in Philadelphia who speaks English?

Layer cake allows you to specialize the experience based on those types of dimensions.  The straight black-or-white policy decisions are easy.  Where the layer cake comes in is where you pull in analytics and work with outcome probabilities.

It’s used mostly in cross-sell, up-sell situations, or retention situations where a customer contacts you and goes through your website and you need to figure out in real-time what is the best product to present to the customer — or has the best chance of driving a successful outcome.

In a case like that, you want to simultaneously score a bunch of offers.  Some providers we work with may have 50 to 60 offers they could present to the customer, so which offer is best? — and which is the best for the customer right now?

The classic case is retention — and that’s also the most sophisticated — because in a contact center environment, as you start asking questions of the customer, you are learning additional context that should drive the kind of offer you propose.

When the customer says “I’m leaving,” the first question is: “Why are you leaving?” And the answer could be, “I’m moving” or “Your service is too expensive,” or “I’ve had technical trouble” or “You don’t carry a handset that your competitor does.”

Each of those answers significantly changes what the next best action might be.

Tom, thanks for this fine briefing.  The layer cake analogy is both highly interesting and food for greater thought :- )

Copyright 2015 Black Swan Telecom Journal

 

About the Expert

Tom Erskine

Tom Erskine

A 18 year veteran of the Communications and Media industry, Tom Erskine is currently the Communications and Media Global Business Line Leader for Pegasystems.  In this role, he oversees the company’s go-to-market strategy and execution in the Communications and Media vertical market.  Under his leadership the Communications and Media business has grown into one of Pega’s largest, serving 6 of the world’s 10 largest providers across wireline, wireless, and Pay TV segments .

Prior to Pegasystems, Tom held senior marketing and product management roles with technology companies in the Communications and Media market, including Convergys Corporation and BCGI.  Tom has also served in an advisory role for successful start-up organizations including BrandNetworks and WHERE.COM.

Tom holds multiple US and international patents for his innovations in customer experience, networking, and billing technology.   Contact Tom via

Related Stories

  • Non-Verbal Speech Analytics: Monitoring Voice Calls in Real-Time for Customer Care, Sales, Retention & Onboarding interview with Yoav Degani — Non-verbal speech analysis studies the emotional context of voice qualities like intonation, tone, emphasis and rhythm.  A pioneer in voice analytics explains how its technology benefits customer care, sales, retention and onboarding.
  • Will Real-Time Decisioning Save Big Data Analytics from Overblown Hype? interview with Tom Erskine — Telecom analytics is more than just collecting and analyzing data.  It’s also about taking action — correct action — often in real-time and across a complex provisioning environment.  In this interview you’ll hear how next best actions are creating value in retention and upselling through a more flexible, business-process driven approach.
  • The Customer Engagement Era: How Personalization & Backend Integration Leads to a Richer Mobile Biz interview with Rita Tochner — How does a mobile operator move its subscribers to higher levels of spending and profit?  Fierce competition, social media scrutiny, and the high cost of new networks all conspire against these goals.  In this interview, however, you’ll learn how engaging better with customers, getting more personal, and being more sensitive to their individual needs is the path forward.
  • B/OSS Mathematics: The Quest to Analyze Business Problems & Drive Operating Decisions interview with Matti Aksela — Analytics is the glory of mathematics brought to practical use.  And in telecom, analytics has merely stratched the surface of its full potential.  In this article, you’ll learn how machine learning is being combined with the power of CDR number crunching to optimize mobile top-ups, control churn — and in the future, help telecoms make critical network and operating decisions.
  • A Mobile Marketer Service: Bridging Personalization & B/OSS Flowthrough interview with Efrat Nakibly — Marketing analytics is a prescriptive program for driving  actions such as sending a timely promotion to a mobile subscriber.  But completeness demands that you also be able to provision that treatment, qualify the promotion, and keep billing fully in the loop.  This article shows how a managed services program can deliver such an end-to-end process and manage customer life cycles on a one-to-one basis.
  • Science of Analytics: Bringing Prepaid Top Ups & Revenue Maximization under the Microscope interview with Derek Edwards — Prepaid subscribers are the customers that carriers know the least about.  The operator is not interacting with prepaid customers on a monthly basis.  You’re not sending a bill, nor do you have detailed profiles on these customers, especially in the developing world where customers are buying SIMs at a grocery store.  This interview explains how contextual marketing meets the unique analytics challenge of prepaid customers.
  • Profitable 3G: China’s Mobile Operators Monetize Networks with Retailers & Partners interview with Kevin Xu — Mobile operators are at the center of explosive growth in wireless services.  But to exploit this opportunity requires IT ingenuity and a broader view on how the mobile user can be served.  In this article you’ll learn the innovative techniques Chinese operators use to monetize 3G networks via analytics and partnerships with retailers, social networks, and advertisers.
  • Customer Analytics: Making the Strategic Leap From Hindsight to Foresight interview with Frank Bernhard — Are your company’s analytics programs scattered?  Is there a strategy in place for customer analytics?  This interview with a leading telecom analytics consultant explains why strategy and planning around the analytics function is crucial to getting your money’s worth.  Topics discussed include: hindsight vs. foresight; an advanced analytics program; and the interface sophistication required to support high end vs. low end analytics users.
  • Analytics Meditations: The Power of Low-Cost Hardware and the Social Network Within interview with Ken King — Analytics didn‘t arrive yesterday.  Data warehousing and BI have been in the telecom vocabulary for twenty-five or more years.  In this interview, you’ll gain a perspective on why “big data” changes the game and why social network (or social circles) analysis promises the next level of insights.  Other interesting topics include: segmenting the analytics market, engaging with carrier clients, and upgrading from older- to newer-style methodologies.
  • Shared Data Plans: The Challenge of Managing a Family of Pricing, Revenue Assurance, Fraud, and Network Policy Issues by Amit Daniel — Verizon Wireless‘ recent announcement of its move to shared data plans for families shook the mobile industry.  In this column, cVidya’s Amit Daniel shines a spotlight on the knowhow and analytics tools that operators now deperately need to offer the right  shared data price plans, ensure bandwidth throttling is handled correctly, and address new fraud concerns.
  • Social Networking for Telecoms: How To Enlist Friends and Family as Mobile Marketers interview with Simon Rees — Social Network Analysis (SNA) is about exploiting data on “friends and family” connections to combat churn and win new CSP business.  The article explores how an analysis of the ebb and flow of CDRs, phone calls, and messages, can identify key influencers and drive powerful marketing campaigns.

Related Articles