Email a colleague    

February 2011

Can Revenue Assurance Pioneers Survive the Age of Analytics?

Can Revenue Assurance Pioneers Survive the Age of Analytics?

"The hero is not fed on sweets,
Daily his own heart he eats;
Chambers of the great are jails,
And head-winds right for royal sails."

—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1841)

No industry association, profession, or software market can survive without fresh thinking and tireless challenging of the status quo.  Yet every year we tolerate conference sessions that put us to sleep, bureaucratic tyrants who suppress debate, and vendor websites that gush sugar-coated nonsense.

So we need more pundits like Eric Priezkalns, experts in their fields who are willing to share their honest — and often contrarian — views in this politically correct age of ours.  Eric is not only a co-founder and prolific contributor to the talkRA portal of revenue assurance commentators, he’s also the unofficial leader in this gang of RA..bble rousers.

From 9 to 5, Eric is an assistant director at Qtel International.  A specialist in both risk management and RA, he’s held key jobs at several firms such as head of controls for Cable & Wireless Group, best practice manager for Revenue Assurance, Billing and Carrier Services for T-Mobile UK and billing integrity manager for Worldcom UK.  Eric first worked as a consultant in the Enterprise Risk Services division of Deloittes, where he also qualified as a chartered accountant.

This month, in fact, Eric and his colleagues have authored a new CRC Press-published book entitled, “Revenue Assurance: Expert Opinions for Communications Providers.“ In my interview with him, Eric previews the book as he muses on the history of RA, points to a dangerous divide in the RA profession, and offers hope for a more exciting and expansive role for RA practitioners who play their cards right.

Dan Baker: First of all, Eric, I’m sure a lot of people are curious how you came to work for Qtel in the Middle East?

Eric Priezkalns: Dan, Qatar is a fascinating place to be.  There are only 1.7 million people in the country, but it has the fifth-largest per capita GNP in the world.  And a full 80 percent of the population are expatriate workers like me.

What the country is trying to do — quite sensibly — is to quickly build up its local industries in finance, technology, and education so they become less reliant on fossil fuels.

Now Qatar Telecom is not just investing in telecoms for the local market, but also buying up telecoms operators in the Middle East and Africa.  So my job is to help them spend their money wisely.  I oversee much of work in the larger telecom group around risk management.  And the job suits me very well because it allows me to look at the bigger picture and gets me into interesting things like analyzing the risks of operating in various countries of the world.

Eric, you’ve been in the RA industry since its birth, so I’m curious: What do you consider to be the biggest changes that have occurred in the RA practice since the early days?  And are we headed on the right track?

Well, the biggest trend is clearly the greater RA automation being driven by technology.

What the vendors did well, almost unconsciously, was to cooperate to create a market and common identity for RA.  Back in 2000, there were 10 companies out there selling revenue assurance solutions that more or less did the same thing.  And that did wonders for defining and building the credibility of the RA profession.

So now it becomes more realistic to propose, as Subex has, that you can have a Revenue Operations Center analogous to the NOC that monitors RA alarms.  In the old days, nobody conceived of that because the technology wasn’t there.  Now it’s precisely the power of this new analytics technology that has kind of split the RA profession into two types of people.

On the one hand you’ve got folks who — like the witches in Macbeth — toss all sorts of data into a big database pot, take a giant wooden spoon, stir it around and round, and see what sort of anomalies bubble to the surface.  At the opposite pole are the Hamlets, the guys who ask a lot of questions about who did what and who killed who.  And these are the process experts who don’t find very much use for data.  They just talk to people.  They talk to people about processes, map those processes, and often don’t care whether a reconciliation is run or not.

Now I don’t think it’s wrong to pick one or the other — or even both of these approaches.  But what I fear is that some of the higher demanded skills, where people need to analyze systems or processes, are suffering because the mantra of the day is to stuff data in the database and just analyze, analyze, analyze.

I would agree.  With every march of “progress“ something is lost.  In fact, software is forcing dozens of telecom back office jobs to be redefined.  And how this will all end up remains a mystery.

If you look at the early days of revenue assurance, the personalities drawn to this job were like the pioneers who settled the American West.  They left civilization to go homestead in the wilderness, and there was no one there to tell you what to do.  Now the only people who could survive a place like that were the creative, imaginative — even quirky people.  But you almost had to have personalities like that because who else was going to go out there?

So that’s what revenue assurance was like in the early days — an open space where people from lots of different backgrounds came together and applied themselves.  It was a wonderful time.  Of course, you can’t stay in pioneering mode forever.  At some point you need to bed down, build a town, and hire school teachers.  So RA is going through that phase right now: building out RA as an ongoing institution.  Now as a result, some of the pioneers have left already because it got too boring.  When there’s nothing new to do, creative people get frustrated.

So unfortunately, I think we’ve lost too much of that pioneering spirit.  People have been too quick to set the rules and say “this is how we do things around here“ and close their minds to notions about how things could be done differently.  Frankly that’s what we’re trying to accomplish with our new book: not dictate answers, but get people to think more broadly about the problems.

Tell us about this book.  What’s in it and how is the material organized?

First of all, I’m one of several authors of it.  And these are RA experts from many different backgrounds, working in several countries — and the experts come from carriers, software vendors, engineers, and universities.  Some chapters get into details, like explaining how you create a control framework.  But there’s another chapter that’s only a two-page snippet of somebody musing on a topic.  In a few cases, we’ve got a mini-debate going on where one expert challenges what another said.

So that’s what we wanted — multiple perspectives.  It’s designed as a book to enjoy reading as opposed to a reference guide where you go to page 245 to an answer for a specific question.  It’s not a manual; it’s a thought provoker to help you look at your current operation.

What can RA departments do to bring back some of that old pioneering mojo you talked about?

Well, the safe course for RA would be to hunker down and say, “This is a very specific kind of department with a one critical mission.“ And to be honest, that approach has been very successful because RA has grown from nothing 10 years ago to being a fixture at most telcos today.  So following a consistent model or template has been a very good thing for RA.  The challenge is to keep that consistency from becoming a straitjacket that discourages the pioneers and imaginative people.

Interestingly enough, I feel that technology may actually be the savior once again.

Up to now, the RA software market has been all about dedicated, specialized software.  However, the RA software vendors are threatened by new players coming in and lumping RA with more generalized business intelligence.  Likewise, the current RA vendors see the market getting saturated, so they also seek to expand into new analytics areas.  In other words, the consensus that drove the industry is falling apart.

Now if you say that RA should do the same thing, year in and year out, it’s not the most exciting job in the world.  And it’s difficult to see how you move your career forward in that sort of job.  So maybe that means we should go back to where we were in the beginning: go back the time when RA was a place where people were comfortable mixing up people skills, process skills, and analytic skills — and now we can throw more technology into the mix too.

Today you can crunch out a big analysis with lots of data in a very short time, so instead of turning RA into a place of boring, intensive audits, we can apply analytics to look at various areas and the frequency depends on how much risk we feel there is — how much is at stake.  If there’s something that’s seriously wrong in any area, I’m going to put my highest-skilled person on that or get somebody else in the business to take responsibility for it.  So I think it’s wise to put some of the lower level RA activities back in the operational areas of the business.

And when you do that, you relieve the RA department of the everyday task of monitoring.  We can take on a more strategic role.  And we can start asking important questions like: How did things go wrong in our business?  And where should we be putting our emphasis to improve?

So it’s shifting emphasis away from looking at data sets to improving the business.  That’s the exciting potential.  And in that world, the analytics is used selectively to look at problem areas without being prisoners of looking at data the same way every day.

The notion of giving some of the RA monitoring back to operations reminds me of the wireline business of NTT in Japan.  They are one of the biggest telcos in the world, yet they never saw a need to build out a separate RA organization because quality control remains an operations responsibility.

Actually there’s a chapter in the book where we ask: “How big should your RA department be?“ Is it one person, 30 or 300?  What’s the measure?

Well, that’s a very hard question to answer because it depends on the style of your organization.  Some places will prefer a centralized function and others are happy to spread the work around to people in other departments.

If you widely distribute the burden and responsibility of RA, a small group of people may suffice.  But if you can’t trust people to do what needs to be done, then you’ll favor a centralized function that works as a task force to solve problems and put controls back in the business.

Eric, it’s been great to rap about RA with you.  Any final thoughts?

Dan, in many ways we’re entering a very exciting period in RA.  And it can become bigger.  It looks at revenues, costs, margins, and how well you utilize your assets and how well your business is executing against its strategic goals.  It’s also doing that with the intelligence that comes from real data.

And though we appreciate the power of analytics and information, we are not a slave to it.  Above all, we retain that flexibility of mind that’s key to supporting the objectives of the business.

This article first appeared in Billing and OSS World.

Copyright 2011 Black Swan Telecom Journal

 
Eric Priezkalns

Eric Priezkalns

Eric Priezkalns is one of the editors and founders of talkRA, the revenue assurance blogging site.  He is the lead author of ‘Revenue Assurance: Expert Opinions for Communications Providers’.

Eric splits his time between freelance consulting and his various passions, which include creative writing.  Eric has specialized in the field of risk and assurance for communications firms since he qualified as a chartered accountant in 1999.

During that time, he has served as Director of Risk Management at Qatar Telecom, Head of Controls for Cable & Wireless Group, Best Practice Manager for Revenue Assurance, Billing and Carrier Services for T-Mobile UK and Billing Integrity Manager for Worldcom UK.   Contact Eric via

Black Swan Solution Guides & Papers

cSwans of a Feather

  • The Bluejay Speaks: How to Rise above the Chatter, Grow Followers, and Deliver Rich, Powerful Content on the Web interview with Michael Bluejay — Telecom professionals need to constantly hone their web communication and marketing skills.  Here we interview a high Google ranking website author who shows how to communicate with power on any subject via the web.
  • Please Mishandle my Telecom Job and Professional Career interview with Eric Priezkalns — Philosopher Nassim Taleb has released a new book on the subject of anti-fragility, a self-invented word describing how people, businessees, and other organic things can benefit from a certain amount of stress, disorder, and shocks.  The article examines Taleb’s theory from the context of the telecom business, and business assurance careers especially.  Professionalism is defined as a bold dedication to scientific inquiry and a data analytics mindset.
  • Can Revenue Assurance Pioneers Survive the Age of Analytics? interview with Eric Priezkalns — Here is a pundit’s analysis of the revenue assurance profession.  Tracing the history of RA from pioneer consultants to modern-day “big data” pros, the article discusses different analysis styles, career strategies, and provides ideas on how RA can further leverage technology to add even greater value to telecom organizations.

Related Articles

  • Black Swan Guide: Araxxe’s Revenue Assurance Consulting, Testing, and High Definition Billing Analysis Service by Dan Baker — How Araxxe’s end-to-end revenue assurance complements switch-to-bill RA  through telescope RA (external and partner data) and microscope RA (high-definition analysis of complex services like bundling and digital services).
  • Subex’s IDcentral Monetizes Telco & Enterprise Data to Deliver Digital ID & Risk Metric Services for Financing, KYC & More interview with Shankar Roddam — A new digital intelligence service that monetizes the idle data of telecoms and enterprises while also earning a good return for the owner of the data.
  • Opportunities & Obstacles: Consultant Luke Taylor Muses on the State of the Telecom Risk Assurance Business interview with Luke Taylor — A rambling discussion on the state of the risk assurance business with Luke Taylor, independent consultant in telecom revenue/fraud assurance and solution requirements and marketing.
  • LATRO’s Tips for Launching a Successful Revenue & Fraud Assurance Program for Mobile Money Operations in Developing Countries interview with Don Reinhart — A company building mobile money RA/FM tools and  managed services gives a concise, but detailed tutorial on how the Mobile Money Ecosystem works.  Revenue assurance pros will get tips on  what to look for in analytics/assurance tools, controls, and professional services.
  • A WeDo Conference Talk: Consulting & Analytics: Improving your Business Today, Enhancing it Tomorrow interview with Carla Cardoso & Bernado Lucas & Thomas Steagall — Leading risk management consultants explain their mission and walk-through RA, subscription fraud, and collections cases.  They also explain how analytics and machine learning can supplement process optimization.
  • PrologMobile’s Simple and Brilliant Plan to Save US MNOs Billions a Year in Recovered Phones & Retained Customers interview with Seth Heine — An expert in the mobile phone reverse supply chain explains how MNOs — via a neutral third party information exchange — can recover their original phones on the used market and save huge sums in multi-year customer retention.
  • WeDo Explores the IoT Ecosystem in Search of Tomorrow’s Pivotal Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions interview with Carlos Marques — A veteran product manager scans the IoT terrain, discusses key fraud and assurance challenges, and explains the preparatory steps WeDo is taking to become a key player in this emerging market.
  • New Report: Telecom Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions, Services & Strategies by Dan Baker & Luke Taylor & Colin Yates — TRI publishes a new market research report, Telecom Fraud & Business Assurance Solutions, Services & Strategies.  Free executive summary available.
  • Subex Juggles a Wide Variety of Business Assurance and Big Data Analytics Use Cases interview with Rohit Maheshwari — A expert in business assurance solutions explains top use cases such as: IoT security, big data analytics/AI, network asset optimization, multi-player gaming assurance, onboarding mobile subs, and AI customer analytics.
  • MTN Agility: Mastering Exponential Technologies in Revenue/Fraud Assurance and Beyond interview with Danie Maritz & Tony Sani & Luke Taylor — An in-depth look at RAFM operations and innovation at the MTN Group.  Topics discussed include RA/fraud control challenges, strategies, and MTN’s journey to exploit exponential tech (AI, robotics, and ML) in its RAFM program and support of internal non-telco businesses.
  • From Byzantine Software Contracts to Simple & Flexible RA Managed Services interview with Philippe Orsini — Is the way B2B/enterprise software is sold and delivered today progressive — or is it Byzantine in the age of cloud?  An expert lays out the case for managed services in RA and billing verification.
  • Premiere Experts Set to Speak at Summer RAG Conference in London, July 7th and 8th by Dan Baker — The Risk and Assurance Group (RAG) has announced that its 2016 summer conference will expand into a two-day event and feature many premiere experts. 
  • WeDo Hosts Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management Conference in Washington DC by Dan Baker — Black Swan is pleased to announce what looks to be a first class revenue assurance and fraud management conference being put on by WeDo Technologies, on October 1st and 2nd in beautiful Washington DC.
  • Test Call Generators: An Essential Test & Debugging Tool in Mobile Billing Assurance interview with Steffen Öftring — An “active” test call generator (TCG) can see problems that a “passive” revenue assurance system is blind to.  Here’s a discussion on the test call RA  process, over-the-air calls versus core call injection, and test call networks in global roaming RA.
  • The Revenue Assurance Game: How the Rules Change in the Era of IoT & Mobile Broadband interview with Rene Felber & Gadi Solotorevsky — Revenue assurance is perhaps the hardest of telecom functions to define because the term is used in so many different senses.  This discussion on the evolving role of revenue assurance was catalyzed by a survey of experts in the profession.
  • Day in the Life of a Revenue Assurance Analyst interview with Michael Lazarou — Revenue assurance is much more than a software category.  It’s individual analysts struggling to help their larger organizations get a handle on system errors and coordination problems.  In this interview, an analyst reveals the many challenges of getting the revenue assurance job done at a small GSM operator in Europe.
  • Revenue Assurance: History and New Beginnings in RA Maturity interview with Daniela Giacomantonio & Gadi Solotorevsky — The Roman Forum was the center of commercial life in ancient Rome.  Now, two millennia later, the Forum lives on in the exchange of ideas across countless professions and  media.  In this interview, two Revenue Assurance experts discuss both the new RA Maturity initiative of the TM Forum and the value of telco/solution vendor collaboration.
  • Migrating systems or launching LTE next year?  Don‘t forget transformation assurance & optimisation by Efrat Nissimov — System transformations and network migrations are major  revenue impacting events and they should raise a big red flag.  Why?  Because data integrity issues are bound to crop up as CSPs move vital data from a legacy system to something new.  It’s time for transformation assurance.
  • How can Cable/DSL Internet Providers Meet the Usage-Based Billing Mandate? interview with Ryan Guthrie — The popularity of YouTube, Netflix, and Hulu other video outlets has turned the tables on service profitability for cable/DSL service providers.  Many are moving to usage-based billing, but that largely unprepared for the revenue assurance aspects of this move.  This interview explains the technical challenge and points to solutions in billing, speed caps, and traffic revenue monitoring.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance: How Rural LECs can Recover $284 Million in Revenue Shortfalls interview with Kelly Cannon & Darrell Merschak — Independent rural LECs in the U.S. still rely on the AMA/EMI billing formats for CABS billing, even as that format has proven to be highly inaccurate as a source of inter-carrier records.  This interview includes an analysis and discussion of revenue recovery techniques ILECs can use by leveraging SS7 probes.  Also discussed are billing strategies, traffic dumping threats, and the possible fallout from the FCC’s bill-and-keep mandate.
  • Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team interview with Kathleen Romano — Business assurance (BA) skills have wide applicability outside the revenue assurance and fraud mangement domains.  In this article, a telecom executive explains how she’s applying her BA skills in the Payments area.  In addition to discussing the key operational challenges in Payments, the interview also provides keen insights on setting goals in business assurance, leading a team, and making critical decisions.
  • LTE Rollout: Make it a Smashing Success with Risk Assessment, Controls, and Marketing Offer Analytics by Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfuly plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This article lays out a 3-phase tactical guide on  how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • RA Prevention: How to Manage Revenue Risks and Communicate RA’s Value to Senior Execs by Shaul Moav — The era of revenue assurance prevention and risk assessment is here.  Several of the mature operators of the world have developed their own methodologies and tools.  Using firefighting and fire prevention as a metaphor, the article details a new commercial software approach explaining the goals, method of risk evaluation, and senior executive dashboards developed for the process.
  • Precision Clockworks: How Revenue Assurance Synchronizes with the Business at Swisscom interview with Marco Pollinger — An expert revenue assurance department is one whose work dovetails well with the lines of businesses it supports.  In this interview you’ll learn how Swisscom manages its revenue assurance function for maximum effect.  The article discusses: the operator’s innovative RA organization, the screening and RA approval of new services, its pre-production bill audits, and its coordination with corporate risk management.
  • Versatile, Portable & Corrections-Savvy: Quest for the Swiss Army Knife of Revenue Assurance Software by Mark Yelland — Revenue assurance maturity models are not cast in stone.  Since  best practices will change over time, it’s healthy to explore moving maturity models forward.  For example, great gains have been made in leakage detection, but RA corrections has been harder to master.  The author dreams about seven functions that should ideally come together in a single all-purpose revenue assurance software tool.
  • Bringing Strategic Planning & Value Engineering to Revenue Assurance interview with Maged Fawzy — Engineering and architectural techniques have a role in revenue assurance.  This interview with a top Egyptian RA consultant explains how continuous risk assessment and long range — yet flexible — RA planning can sharpen a carrier’s RA program and lead to better use of revenue assurance software and integration services.
  • Forensic Fossils: Is Your Revenue Assurance Shop Fit for Display at a Natural History Museum? interview with Jim Marsh — Without the continuous guiding light of seasoned revenue assurance leaders, even the best teams of RA professionals, technology, and business processes can fossilize and lose their vitality.
  • Revenue Assurance: The Magical Market Cap Multiplier by Van Howard & Curtis Mills — Many operators today consider revenue assurance yesterday’s opportunity.  But this article shows why significant revenue and cost leakage can still go undetected, even in companies with dedicated RA departments.  Also discussed are the benefits of a broader or more “forensic” approach to revenue assurance, an approach that boosts the bottom line regardless of the automated tools already in place.
  • From Risk to Robust: Turning the Big Picture Into a Real Agenda for Change in Telecoms by Eric Priezkalns — Inspired by a Financial Times article written by Nassim Taleb, author of “The Black Swan”, here is an insightful and entertaining primer on telecom risk management.  The article takes ten risk management lessons from Taleb and applies them specifically to the communications industry.  You’ll learn about the value of small scale trials, organization accountability, cures for a blame culture, incentives that work, the power of simplicity, and more.
  • Synthesizing the Telecom Business Assurance Practice With the Analytics World by Dan Baker — Business assurance is a wrapper term that allows you to draw a circle around various telecom assurance, control, and optimization activities.  This article maps business assurance as a subset of telecom analytics, constrasting it with marketing analytics while a diagram shows where biz assurance fits in the larger B/OSS world.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win by Cheryl Smith Rardin & David West — Revenue assurance innovation is far easier when partners cooperate to make it happen.  This articles shows how a U.S. operator, software vendor, and consultant teamed to develop a breakthrough in Carrier Access Billing (CABS) assurance.  Learn about: the dispute resolution data gap that needed to be filled, the partnering strategy, the implementation challenges, and payback results.
  • Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software? interview with Sergio Luis Silvestre — Business controls software, originally developed for RA, is finding application in other areas of the business such as internal audit, collections, security and risk management.  This article argues that “business assurance” is the best term to describe this broader set of  controls software that can find a home in numerous departments or functions of a CSP’s business.
  • PwC on the Business of Revenue Assurance Consulting & Mentoring interview with Tim Banks & Dan Stevens — Revenue assurance consulting firms offer a broad range of services to clients these days.  The article explains the practice of mentoring RA mangers and providing a CFO with visibility on the status of an operator’s business controls.  Perspective is also offered on the value of RA software and the opportunity to broaden the RA practice scope.
  • Robots for Hire: Verifying Accuracy In the Age of Complex Mobile Billing/Charging interview with Xavier Lesage — As real-time charging and complex lifestyle calling plans gain credence across the globe in wireless, billing quality issues will rise in importance.  This article discusses a unique managed services approach to invoice testing and roaming fraud protection that checks results against advertised or published source data for the utmost accuracy.
  • Ericsson: Revenue Assurance Consulting With an NGN Flavor interview with Thomas Steagall — Helping operators detect billing and provisioning problem is merely table stakes in the RA services business these days.  The article discuss why operators need to ramp up their RA function with service experience and group-wide financial health monitoring.  Advise is also offered on: key RA maturity questions, risk-and-reward contracts, and how to extract greater value from software investments.
  • Do-It-Yourself RA for Small Operators and MVNOs interview with Mark Yelland — Budget-minded small operators and MVNOs are no longer hamstrung in RA capability anymore.  This article offers high-leverage strategies for operators who cannot afford expensive RA software tools.  With  data access, brains, and a DIY philosophy, any small operator can map a  path to greater RA savings, maturity, and program growth.
  • Revenue Assurance Maturity: Report From the Arena interview with Eric Nelson — Revenue assurance maturity can‘t be easily computed.  How do you  compare the KPIs of Comcast billing with that of mobile money RA in Western Africa?  Even still, this article offers some universal RA wisdom from a straight-shooting veteran of carriers large and small.  Topics discussed include: dashboard or process, COTS vs. inhouse solutions, and tips on gaining internal support for the RA practice.