Email a colleague    

October 2011

Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software?

Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software?

Whoever coined the term “Revenue Assurance“ wasn’t the greatest wordsmith in the world, yet she succeeded mightily because RA has entered the telecom vocabulary.  It’s the subject of several industry conferences, some training courses, plus hundreds of telecom people use the term on their business cards.

But now, one of the foremost suppliers of revenue assurance software, WeDo Technologies, is having second thoughts.  WeDo — along with many of its software competitors — think it’s high time to expand our horizons a bit and start using a broader term called “Business Assurance.“

And here to debate that idea with me is Sérgio Luis Silvestre, vice president of Marketing at WeDo Technologies.

Let me first say that “Revenue Assurance“ is a bit of a misnomer because, depending on the telecom organization, revenue maximization may not be the direct goal.  Maybe improving profitability or delivering a better customer experience is the main mission.  For instance, correcting overbilling problems will certainly cause your revenue to go down in the short run, but the good will of that gesture will hopefully generate greater profits (or revenue) over the customer’s entire life cycle with you.

To me, Revenue Assurance — in its broadly applied sense — is about monitoring, preserving and enhancing the relationship with customers and key business partners.

Dan Baker: Sérgio, let me begin by going back to an earlier blog discussion I had with Guera Romo about organization accountability.  Her concern is that as RA software vendors expand their portfolio to cover new areas, such as collections assurance, people automatically assume those functions should be managed out of RA.  And when that happens, it upsets the employees, policy, and work methods already in place to manage that function.

Sérgio Luis Silvestre: From our perspective at WeDo, that’s exactly the concept we want to challenge.  We are not saying that our business assurance RAID software tool should be managed and run only by the RA department.  No, RA teams were the first teams to use it, but we don’t necessarily see that as the situation going forward, though we do hope that the RA teams will be our strongest evangelists.

The revenue assurance teams are a key community.  But if you look at a telco, retailer, or bank, they are not the only team controlling the business.  You have internal audit, revenue protection/assurance, security and risk management teams.  Then there are the operational assurance teams, management control, strategic planning, etc.  If you look at all those teams, you notice they are not integrated.  Many of the control teams out there are using Excel or simple data marts developed to solve a particular problem, but they don’t have a real tool to look at the wider picture.

For me, it’s clear that a management and control team should leverage our product.  Why shouldn’t the risk management folks be able to use the same tool their RA colleagues have already paid for?

We also see business assurance as being applicable to many industries because the lack of integrated control, trouble accessing the data, issues communicating internally between areas to solve the detected problems and the need to devise KPIs are a cross-industry need.

Fine, then.  It seems that your position and Guera’s are really not that far apart.  I like the idea of a common data platform with multiple control applications on top used by different teams.  It makes sense.  The only problem I have with “Business Assurance“ is it’s quite broad and doesn’t have the industry cache that revenue assurance has.  We struggled for a decade to get people to recognize the importance of RA.  And now we are being asked to carve out a new function: business assurance.  I also question how different Business Assurance is from Analytics or the Smarter Planet, terms that IBM is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to advertise and promote around the globe.

Our point is that the average company spends millions on management systems but a relatively small amount on control systems.  Most of your control teams continue to work on samples and Excel spreadsheets.

Sometimes the system is the problem, but in most cases it is not.  Given the way that different business processes are implemented, it’s not always possible to detect inefficiencies between the systems.  Which information system are you using to give you a different view?  For years, accountants complained: Why do we need internal auditors?  Those auditors have exactly the same skill that we have.  Why do we need auditors?

Well, sometimes it takes a few catastrophic events, like the blow-ups at WorldCom and Arthur Andersen.  Only then does the wisdom of staffing an internal auditor function come into sharp focus.  And in a similar way: if every system works properly, why do we need revenue assurance teams?  Even if the individual systems are working perfectly, there is still room for human error and fraud.

Incidentally, the concept of Business Assurance is not WeDo’s.  We were, though, pioneers in adopting it in the revenue assurance and fraud management space.  Our CEO, Rui Paiva, publicly announced our vision for Business Assurance in May 2009 at our worldwide user group, when we realized how powerful and far-reaching our tool was.  We wanted to take Revenue Assurance, Fraud Management and other control areas tools to the next level.  So we think this concept makes sense not only for us, but for all RA and fraud management vendors.

TRI’s market research certainly suggests that the pure revenue assurance tool market is fairly mature in places like North America.  So companies who sell RA tools need to look to adjacent telecom markets and beyond to sell their products and services.  Still, I could point to areas where control opportunities abound in telecom alone — places like least cost routing, insider/dealer fraud, customer and service profitability analysis, and usage-based cost management, to name a few.  One particular area that I’ve yet to hear much talk about is mobile network policy.  Oi in Brazil has a service delivery platform that makes autonomous decisions about what promotions the customer gets.  Well, controls need to be wrapped around a powerful platform like that.  And when telecoms boost and throttle the bandwidth for individual smartphone users, that’s another area to watch.

At least people are now finally debating the role of business assurance.  Norbert Scholz of Gartner, for instance, says that Business Assurance should include only the corporate side of control and not the operations side.  That’s fine.  People will have different opinions on the precise meaning of these terms.  But that’s what I call a good discussion.  Clearly when RA started, there was a lot of debate about what it was, so having debate is healthy.  Even now people keep forgetting the cost side of Revenue Assurance and still say things like “in the U.S., with its huge bucket voice plans, most of the risk is gone.“ Please don’t make this huge mistake.

At WeDo we clearly acknowledge that the concept definition of Business Assurance (“Business assurance is essentially about using systems to improve operational effectiveness and manage risk“) was not first written by us.  It was the dream to have all the data to control the business.  But people some years ago had no concept that you could control systems like that in an affordable way.  But technology had to evolve and now it’s become possible.

If you look at all the financial crises around the world, it speaks to this lack of control or lack of regulation.

So the key question is: How much are we (CSPs) investing in intelligent control?  We spend tons of money on information systems, but we are not coping with how the business processes and systems come together or how they both interface to the people at the company.  So this is the premise of WeDo’s business: The world is going to start to get more intelligent and agile about controls.

Why did network policy become important?  Because the billing systems — prepaid and postpaid — and the provisioning systems are doing their own job, but not serving the customer.  If provisioning doesn’t communicate with CRM, every time someone calls customer service, you won’t be able to respond to the customer or solve the issue.

How broadly should we paint Business Assurance?  Does it include all control activity in the telecom enterprise?  What are the limits?  Let’s say you are ordering a new router from Cisco.  Did the router arrive in the warehouse?  That would require a control.  Should that be under the purview of Business Assurance?

It definitely should be.  Cisco is a telecom partner.  Ericsson, NSN, Huawei and Alcatel-Lucent also do managed services of the network.  Many operators have totally outsourcing their network.  How can both the vendor and operator control not only the SLAs, but the real assets that are being run by those partnerships?

Today it may be good for me as a CSP to outsource my network.  The business plan looks just fine and I need the cash.  So I outsource.  However, four years down the road, the world changes and maybe I prefer to run the network myself — to in-source it.

So here’s the trouble.  If we don’t make systems that make the outsourcer relationship transparent, it doesn’t work for the outsourcers and it doesn’t work for the operator.  That’s the beauty of setting up and automating controls.

I think it’s important to define business assurance and have some sort of scope in mind, but we shouldn’t be constrained by those definitions.  If a mission-critical system lacks controls, you need to give it controls.  Network asset management is one of those situations.  How much money are the operators spending in maintenance fees for underused or never used hardware in their networks?  It’s tons of money.

Thanks for these insights, Sérgio.  For me at least, you’ve severed the Gordian Knot.  Expanding our vocabulary to Business Assurance or seeking a wider use for control software is logically distinct from the question of who in the telco organization should manage a particular audit or control function.  And whether you call that new animal Business Assurance or Revenue Assurance Plus, we at least agree on one thing: Telecom business controls need to be applied in far more areas that we’ve traditionally conceived.

This article first appeared in Billing and OSS World.

Copyright 2011 Black Swan Telecom Journal

 

About the Expert

Sergio Luis Silvestre

Sergio Luis Silvestre

Sérgio Luis Silvestre is the chief marketing officer at WeDo Technologies, a leader in Revenue and Business Assurance software and services.

Related Stories

  • Premiere Experts Set to Speak at Summer RAG Conference in London, July 7th and 8th by Dan Baker — The Risk and Assurance Group (RAG) has announced that its 2016 summer conference will expand into a two-day event and feature many premiere experts. 
  • RA Prevention: How to Manage Revenue Risks and Communicate RA’s Value to Senior Execs by Shaul Moav — The era of revenue assurance prevention and risk assessment is here.  Several of the mature operators of the world have developed their own methodologies and tools.  Using firefighting and fire prevention as a metaphor, the article details a new commercial software approach explaining the goals, method of risk evaluation, and senior executive dashboards developed for the process.
  • From Risk to Robust: Turning the Big Picture Into a Real Agenda for Change in Telecoms by Eric Priezkalns — Inspired by a Financial Times article written by Nassim Taleb, author of “The Black Swan”, here is an insightful and entertaining primer on telecom risk management.  The article takes ten risk management lessons from Taleb and applies them specifically to the communications industry.  You’ll learn about the value of small scale trials, organization accountability, cures for a blame culture, incentives that work, the power of simplicity, and more.
  • Synthesizing the Telecom Business Assurance Practice With the Analytics World by Dan Baker — Business assurance is a wrapper term that allows you to draw a circle around various telecom assurance, control, and optimization activities.  This article maps business assurance as a subset of telecom analytics, constrasting it with marketing analytics while a diagram shows where biz assurance fits in the larger B/OSS world.
  • Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software? interview with SÚrgio Luis Silvestre — Business controls software, originally developed for RA, is finding application in other areas of the business such as internal audit, collections, security and risk management.  This article argues that “business assurance” is the best term to describe this broader set of  controls software that can find a home in numerous departments or functions of a CSP’s business.

Related Articles

  • Premiere Experts Set to Speak at Summer RAG Conference in London, July 7th and 8th by Dan Baker — The Risk and Assurance Group (RAG) has announced that its 2016 summer conference will expand into a two-day event and feature many premiere experts. 
  • WeDo Hosts Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management Conference in Washington DC by Dan Baker — Black Swan is pleased to announce what looks to be a first class revenue assurance and fraud management conference being put on by WeDo Technologies, on October 1st and 2nd in beautiful Washington DC.
  • Test Call Generators: An Essential Test & Debugging Tool in Mobile Billing Assurance interview with Steffen Öftring — An “active” test call generator (TCG) can see problems that a “passive” revenue assurance system is blind to.  Here’s a discussion on the test call RA  process, over-the-air calls versus core call injection, and test call networks in global roaming RA.
  • The Revenue Assurance Game: How the Rules Change in the Era of IoT & Mobile Broadband interview with Rene Felber & Gadi Solotorevsky — Revenue assurance is perhaps the hardest of telecom functions to define because the term is used in so many different senses.  This discussion on the evolving role of revenue assurance was catalyzed by a survey of experts in the profession.
  • Day in the Life of a Revenue Assurance Analyst interview with Michael Lazarou — Revenue assurance is much more than a software category.  It’s individual analysts struggling to help their larger organizations get a handle on system errors and coordination problems.  In this interview, an analyst reveals the many challenges of getting the revenue assurance job done at a small GSM operator in Europe.
  • Revenue Assurance: History and New Beginnings in RA Maturity interview with Daniela Giacomantonio & Gadi Solotorevsky — The Roman Forum was the center of commercial life in ancient Rome.  Now, two millennia later, the Forum lives on in the exchange of ideas across countless professions and  media.  In this interview, two Revenue Assurance experts discuss both the new RA Maturity initiative of the TM Forum and the value of telco/solution vendor collaboration.
  • Migrating systems or launching LTE next year?  Don‘t forget transformation assurance & optimisation by Efrat Nissimov — System transformations and network migrations are major  revenue impacting events and they should raise a big red flag.  Why?  Because data integrity issues are bound to crop up as CSPs move vital data from a legacy system to something new.  It’s time for transformation assurance.
  • How can Cable/DSL Internet Providers Meet the Usage-Based Billing Mandate? interview with Ryan Guthrie — The popularity of YouTube, Netflix, and Hulu other video outlets has turned the tables on service profitability for cable/DSL service providers.  Many are moving to usage-based billing, but that largely unprepared for the revenue assurance aspects of this move.  This interview explains the technical challenge and points to solutions in billing, speed caps, and traffic revenue monitoring.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance: How Rural LECs can Recover $284 Million in Revenue Shortfalls interview with Kelly Cannon & Darrell Merschak — Independent rural LECs in the U.S. still rely on the AMA/EMI billing formats for CABS billing, even as that format has proven to be highly inaccurate as a source of inter-carrier records.  This interview includes an analysis and discussion of revenue recovery techniques ILECs can use by leveraging SS7 probes.  Also discussed are billing strategies, traffic dumping threats, and the possible fallout from the FCC’s bill-and-keep mandate.
  • Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team interview with Kathleen Romano — Business assurance (BA) skills have wide applicability outside the revenue assurance and fraud mangement domains.  In this article, a telecom executive explains how she’s applying her BA skills in the Payments area.  In addition to discussing the key operational challenges in Payments, the interview also provides keen insights on setting goals in business assurance, leading a team, and making critical decisions.
  • Webinar: Rolling Out LTE?  How to Prevent Revenue Leakage and Fraud webinar featuring Amir Gefen & Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfully plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This 43-minute on-demand webinar lays out a strategy for how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • Webinar: Quest for the Next Revenue Assurance City of Gold — A Consultant’s Guide to Hidden RA Treasure webinar featuring Jim Marsh & Curtis Mills — In this 32-minute, fully indexed webinar, two North American consultants explain why revenue assurance remains one of smartest business investments a service provider can make.  Topics include: 1) marrying great software with expert knowledge/experience; 2) strategies for bringing an RA program up to date especially as new products are rolled out; 3) likely leakage areas to investigate; 4) applying RA-honed skills to benefit marketing and customer analytics; and 5) the biggest RA mistakes operators make.
  • LTE Rollout: Make it a Smashing Success with Risk Assessment, Controls, and Marketing Offer Analytics by Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfuly plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This article lays out a 3-phase tactical guide on  how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • RA Prevention: How to Manage Revenue Risks and Communicate RA’s Value to Senior Execs by Shaul Moav — The era of revenue assurance prevention and risk assessment is here.  Several of the mature operators of the world have developed their own methodologies and tools.  Using firefighting and fire prevention as a metaphor, the article details a new commercial software approach explaining the goals, method of risk evaluation, and senior executive dashboards developed for the process.
  • Precision Clockworks: How Revenue Assurance Synchronizes with the Business at Swisscom interview with Marco Pollinger — An expert revenue assurance department is one whose work dovetails well with the lines of businesses it supports.  In this interview you’ll learn how Swisscom manages its revenue assurance function for maximum effect.  The article discusses: the operator’s innovative RA organization, the screening and RA approval of new services, its pre-production bill audits, and its coordination with corporate risk management.
  • Versatile, Portable & Corrections-Savvy: Quest for the Swiss Army Knife of Revenue Assurance Software by Mark Yelland — Revenue assurance maturity models are not cast in stone.  Since  best practices will change over time, it’s healthy to explore moving maturity models forward.  For example, great gains have been made in leakage detection, but RA corrections has been harder to master.  The author dreams about seven functions that should ideally come together in a single all-purpose revenue assurance software tool.
  • Bringing Strategic Planning & Value Engineering to Revenue Assurance interview with Maged Fawzy — Engineering and architectural techniques have a role in revenue assurance.  This interview with a top Egyptian RA consultant explains how continuous risk assessment and long range — yet flexible — RA planning can sharpen a carrier’s RA program and lead to better use of revenue assurance software and integration services.
  • Forensic Fossils: Is Your Revenue Assurance Shop Fit for Display at a Natural History Museum? interview with Jim Marsh — Without the continuous guiding light of seasoned revenue assurance leaders, even the best teams of RA professionals, technology, and business processes can fossilize and lose their vitality.
  • Revenue Assurance: The Magical Market Cap Multiplier by Van Howard & Curtis Mills — Many operators today consider revenue assurance yesterday’s opportunity.  But this article shows why significant revenue and cost leakage can still go undetected, even in companies with dedicated RA departments.  Also discussed are the benefits of a broader or more “forensic” approach to revenue assurance, an approach that boosts the bottom line regardless of the automated tools already in place.
  • From Risk to Robust: Turning the Big Picture Into a Real Agenda for Change in Telecoms by Eric Priezkalns — Inspired by a Financial Times article written by Nassim Taleb, author of “The Black Swan”, here is an insightful and entertaining primer on telecom risk management.  The article takes ten risk management lessons from Taleb and applies them specifically to the communications industry.  You’ll learn about the value of small scale trials, organization accountability, cures for a blame culture, incentives that work, the power of simplicity, and more.
  • Synthesizing the Telecom Business Assurance Practice With the Analytics World by Dan Baker — Business assurance is a wrapper term that allows you to draw a circle around various telecom assurance, control, and optimization activities.  This article maps business assurance as a subset of telecom analytics, constrasting it with marketing analytics while a diagram shows where biz assurance fits in the larger B/OSS world.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win by Cheryl Smith Rardin & David West — Revenue assurance innovation is far easier when partners cooperate to make it happen.  This articles shows how a U.S. operator, software vendor, and consultant teamed to develop a breakthrough in Carrier Access Billing (CABS) assurance.  Learn about: the dispute resolution data gap that needed to be filled, the partnering strategy, the implementation challenges, and payback results.
  • Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software? interview with SÚrgio Luis Silvestre — Business controls software, originally developed for RA, is finding application in other areas of the business such as internal audit, collections, security and risk management.  This article argues that “business assurance” is the best term to describe this broader set of  controls software that can find a home in numerous departments or functions of a CSP’s business.
  • PwC on the Business of Revenue Assurance Consulting & Mentoring interview with Tim Banks & Dan Stevens — Revenue assurance consulting firms offer a broad range of services to clients these days.  The article explains the practice of mentoring RA mangers and providing a CFO with visibility on the status of an operator’s business controls.  Perspective is also offered on the value of RA software and the opportunity to broaden the RA practice scope.
  • Robots for Hire: Verifying Accuracy In the Age of Complex Mobile Billing/Charging interview with Xavier Lesage — As real-time charging and complex lifestyle calling plans gain credence across the globe in wireless, billing quality issues will rise in importance.  This article discusses a unique managed services approach to invoice testing and roaming fraud protection that checks results against advertised or published source data for the utmost accuracy.
  • Ericsson: Revenue Assurance Consulting With an NGN Flavor interview with Thomas Steagall — Helping operators detect billing and provisioning problem is merely table stakes in the RA services business these days.  The article discuss why operators need to ramp up their RA function with service experience and group-wide financial health monitoring.  Advise is also offered on: key RA maturity questions, risk-and-reward contracts, and how to extract greater value from software investments.
  • Do-It-Yourself RA for Small Operators and MVNOs interview with Mark Yelland — Budget-minded small operators and MVNOs are no longer hamstrung in RA capability anymore.  This article offers high-leverage strategies for operators who cannot afford expensive RA software tools.  With  data access, brains, and a DIY philosophy, any small operator can map a  path to greater RA savings, maturity, and program growth.
  • Revenue Assurance Maturity: Report From the Arena interview with Eric Nelson — Revenue assurance maturity can‘t be easily computed.  How do you  compare the KPIs of Comcast billing with that of mobile money RA in Western Africa?  Even still, this article offers some universal RA wisdom from a straight-shooting veteran of carriers large and small.  Topics discussed include: dashboard or process, COTS vs. inhouse solutions, and tips on gaining internal support for the RA practice.
  • Revenue Assurance: Where Do We Go from Here? by Rob Mattison — By leveraging a good core understanding of telco technologies, operations and revenue management activities, RA professionals are applying their knowledge in areas such as Margin Assurance, Market Assurance, Revenue Engineering, and Revenue Governance.  This article lays out some useful definitions of the many facets of business and revenue assurance.