Email a colleague    

January 2012

CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win

CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win

My previous blogs have focused on the importance of a great working relationship between software vendors and carriers.  That’s why I’m pleased to have Cheryl Smith Rardin, manager, revenue assurance at Consolidated Communications, join me in this blog.  Consolidated and Equinox have been working together since 1988, and we’re going to share the positive effect of our great working relationship.  Specifically, we’ll talk about how we recently collaborated on a CABS Validation process at Consolidated.

David West: Welcome, Cheryl.

Cheryl Smith Rardin: Thanks for inviting me, David.  First, I think readers would probably like to know a bit about Consolidated.  Actually, I joined the firm 38 years ago when we were just a small rural operator called Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company.  After merging with McLeod, then divesting from them, we acquired TXU out of Texas, which put us into metropolitan markets for the first time.  Next was North Pittsburgh, which took us into our third state and the CLEC business.  So our company name says it all: Over the years, we’ve “consolidated“ several diverse operators under one telco.

David: Before we get into project details, Cheryl, I want to explain something upfront to readers.  While the project’s mission was to create a good ROI for Consolidated through CABS validation, the situation was a big win/win because it also allowed Equinox to advance its software.  This project became the vehicle for taking our TeleLink usage-analysis platform to the next level of revenue-assurance issues.

While we could have developed a CABS revenue-assurance platform in a vacuum, it’s not our style to initiate a major new development project without first getting a paying sponsor.  And while I’m sure there are people who think that policy is ridiculous, we’re convinced that having a paying customer ensures that we are building something that’s commercially viable as it addresses clearly actual business needs.

Now for the project details: Cheryl, her boss and I were attending a conference on access avoidance.  While there was a lot of talk (and not a lot of agreement) about “phantom traffic,“ the primary issue was clear — carriers, including Consolidated, were seeing a decline in CABS revenue.  And everyone agreed that they didn’t want to see this cash cow to go away.

After a dinner conversation at the conference, we decided to partner with Consolidated to address this very issue.  After much discussion, Equinox wrote a three-part product description and proposed a price.  This initial statement of work simply stated that Equinox should 1) compare AMA to SS7 records and examine all the usage that traverses the network; 2) bounce the AMA against what comes out of the CABS system to make sure the billable usage is getting billed; and finally 3) compare actual usage to expected usage based on historical trends and industry standards.

Those three comparisons — AMA to SS7, AMA to CABS, and actual to expected usage — comprised our project plan.  It’s a testament to Consolidated’s faith in us, coupled with the fact that our Protector fraud-management system had delivered for them over the years, that they gave the project the green light.

Cheryl: Actually the third, key partner in our deal was Sue Platner, an industry expert in all manner of CABS regulations and operations best-practices.  Sue bridged our knowledge gap and helped us and Equinox talk to each other and troubleshoot.  It was Sue’s job to go down the rabbit trails and figure out why things weren‘t matching up.  And her industry knowledge also plugged the holes left by the CABS people who had retired or left the company.

We’re a typical service provider.  We’ve got our heads down in operations, so we don‘t know what we don’t know.  With CABS, we didn‘t know what or where our process needed to change.  And when you think about it, CABS is kind of an extension of your fraud-management system because the carriers you’re billing are looking to skirt any rule they can.  Since they’re eager to get the lowest cost, they won’t tell you if you’re billing them less than you should.  So we knew we needed to be more vigilant and look after our own interests.

David West: How did you know that there may be trouble in your CABS processes?

Cheryl: Well one clue was a very high volume of disputes outstanding.  Some carriers hadn’t paid their bills in months because they said the bills were wrong.  Some companies may dispute things just to be ornery; however, we had several carriers with significant outstanding disputes.  That’s when Sue Platner came along with this pearl of wisdom: “A high number of disputes means there’s something wrong with the process.“

I think we are probably like a lot of companies.  Our CABS processes had drifted along for 20 years without much change.  We had never done any deep-dive evaluation.  Plus the regulations are downright confusing.  The NECA rules applied in Pennsylvania; there were price-capping issues in Illinois and Texas; there are so many different rules that play into CABS it makes you want to pull your hair out!

So it was a relief to get some help.  We had never done some of the advanced CABS audits, such as reconciling AMA to SS7, to see what might fall out.  This simple audit helped us identify a number of trunk groups where we didn‘t have messaging turned on for all billable record types.

David: Prior to this project, TeleLink analyzed usage and produced reports using LERG or TPM information to determine the jurisdiction.  But Consolidated was the first customer to have us go further and identify local traffic using LCADS, though others have since followed using other data sources.  Ultimately each CDR was enriched with information about jurisdiction (local, interLATA, intraLATA, interstate, intrastate traffic, toll-free, etc.), directionality and type (wireline, wireless, VoIP, etc.) and other important data points using reference tables and a number of complex algorithms.

While it was certainly a challenge to incorporate these complex rules into TeleLink, it was also a significant evolutionary step for TeleLink — like going from adolescence to adulthood.

David: Where were you able to find revenue using the three comparisons in TeleLink?

Cheryl: Clearly the biggest source of error was call-record generation in switching.  Since Consolidated has been around for 100+ years, our switch environment is a mixed bag.  We have some switches that pre-date the Internet era and wireless world as well as a number of newer soft switches.

With the newer switches, missing call records is a non-issue because those switches cut a call record for every single call whether it is billable or not.  However, that’s not the case for the legacy local switches.  Given the cost of storage-processing capability at the time, maximum efficiency was a big concern.  These switches don’t automatically create a call record for each event, because much of the local usage is “non-billable.“

In one case, we noticed a lot more billable usage reported on our SS7 network than we found based on the switch AMA records.  Sure enough! When a certain type of traffic that was formerly “not-billable“ became “billable,” the switch was not configured to create call records for that.

David: This project was developmentally complex, for sure.  For instance, there were also complex legacy rules and state-specific processes in place at Consolidated that had to be understood and applied so that we could create a true “apples to apples“ comparison.  Making things harder was the fact that in many cases, the person who had originally written Consolidated’s mediation rules many years ago was no longer there.  In fact, in some cases there were two or three generations of employees between the person who originally wrote their code and the person now supporting it, and there was not a lot of supporting documentation on the mediation rules in place.

But our development team met these types of challenges head on and didn’t stop until all of the issues were addressed satisfactorily.

David: In the end, Cheryl, what do you think the project accomplished?

Cheryl: Well, senior management had a clear expectation of what the ROI target was and we pretty much hit that.  Within the first 18 months, our total recovery was three or four times our initial investment.  Of course, as we started producing results, our executive team took an added interest in our success and wanted to be sure we turned over every rock.

The recovery and continued success is possible because we have a great process and tools to deliver daily, weekly, monthly reports and graphs that detail the AMA to SS7 to CABS to usage comparisons.  If something changes and there’s a disconnect, the team can act on it.

And it’s even gotten us into some of that “proactive“ revenue assurance buzzword stuff.  Before the CABS bill goes out, we can say, “Hey! wait a minute, we think there’s something wrong here.  Let’s do some research and get it right.”

David West: Thanks for joining me in the blog, Cheryl.  Do you have any final thoughts?

Cheryl: Yes, we obviously benefited from the project on multiple levels.  It was very educational.  It’s made us more SOX-compliant.  And it feels good to be working with a professional and up-to-date process.  We were also able to unite our CABS operation across regions.  Of course, it was painful for us to find things that had fallen through the cracks, but it’s been all good.  I just wish we had done it sooner.

Best of all, we now have a great deal of data to back us up when a dispute arises.  If somebody claims that we overbilled, it takes only a few clicks to provide the usage to support how we billed and successfully defend our position.  We had push-backs from carriers in the past, but because we now have the data, I guarantee we can collect the money.

Bottom line: Whoever has the best data is going to prevail in the dispute.  At the onset of the project, Sue cautioned our executives that we might not be able to collect everything that we were owed.  I’m pleased to report that we eventually did collect 100 percent of all back bills!

Service providers who don’t have similar CABS audits and checks in place are likely missing several great revenue opportunities.  As Sue Platner says, they are missing the low-hanging fruit.

This article first appeared in Billing and OSS World.

Copyright 2012 Black Swan Telecom Journal

 

About the Experts

David West

David West

David West is executive vice president of Equinox Information Systems, responsible for developing and implementing the company’s long-term strategic plan, including product design and marketing.

Equinox Information Systems is one of the leading fraud and RA software vendors in the U.S.   Contact David via

Cheryl Smith Rardin

Cheryl Smith Rardin

Cheryl Smith Rardin is responsible for accessing and protecting the company’s revenue streams in her current position as revenue assurance manager at Consolidated Communications.  Before this position, Cheryl was tasked with identifying and preventing fraud in her role as Consolidated’s fraud prevention manager.

Founded more than a century ago, Consolidated Communications is a family of companies providing advanced communications services to both residential and business customers in the U.S. states of Illinois, Texas and Pennsylvania.

Related Stories

  • CABS Revenue Assurance: How Rural LECs can Recover $284 Million in Revenue Shortfalls interview with Kelly Cannon & Darrell Merschak — Independent rural LECs in the U.S. still rely on the AMA/EMI billing formats for CABS billing, even as that format has proven to be highly inaccurate as a source of inter-carrier records.  This interview includes an analysis and discussion of revenue recovery techniques ILECs can use by leveraging SS7 probes.  Also discussed are billing strategies, traffic dumping threats, and the possible fallout from the FCC’s bill-and-keep mandate.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win by Cheryl Smith Rardin & David West — Revenue assurance innovation is far easier when partners cooperate to make it happen.  This articles shows how a U.S. operator, software vendor, and consultant teamed to develop a breakthrough in Carrier Access Billing (CABS) assurance.  Learn about: the dispute resolution data gap that needed to be filled, the partnering strategy, the implementation challenges, and payback results.

Related Articles

  • Premiere Experts Set to Speak at Summer RAG Conference in London, July 7th and 8th by Dan Baker — The Risk and Assurance Group (RAG) has announced that its 2016 summer conference will expand into a two-day event and feature many premiere experts. 
  • WeDo Hosts Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management Conference in Washington DC by Dan Baker — Black Swan is pleased to announce what looks to be a first class revenue assurance and fraud management conference being put on by WeDo Technologies, on October 1st and 2nd in beautiful Washington DC.
  • Test Call Generators: An Essential Test & Debugging Tool in Mobile Billing Assurance interview with Steffen Öftring — An “active” test call generator (TCG) can see problems that a “passive” revenue assurance system is blind to.  Here’s a discussion on the test call RA  process, over-the-air calls versus core call injection, and test call networks in global roaming RA.
  • The Revenue Assurance Game: How the Rules Change in the Era of IoT & Mobile Broadband interview with Rene Felber & Gadi Solotorevsky — Revenue assurance is perhaps the hardest of telecom functions to define because the term is used in so many different senses.  This discussion on the evolving role of revenue assurance was catalyzed by a survey of experts in the profession.
  • Day in the Life of a Revenue Assurance Analyst interview with Michael Lazarou — Revenue assurance is much more than a software category.  It’s individual analysts struggling to help their larger organizations get a handle on system errors and coordination problems.  In this interview, an analyst reveals the many challenges of getting the revenue assurance job done at a small GSM operator in Europe.
  • Revenue Assurance: History and New Beginnings in RA Maturity interview with Daniela Giacomantonio & Gadi Solotorevsky — The Roman Forum was the center of commercial life in ancient Rome.  Now, two millennia later, the Forum lives on in the exchange of ideas across countless professions and  media.  In this interview, two Revenue Assurance experts discuss both the new RA Maturity initiative of the TM Forum and the value of telco/solution vendor collaboration.
  • Migrating systems or launching LTE next year?  Don‘t forget transformation assurance & optimisation by Efrat Nissimov — System transformations and network migrations are major  revenue impacting events and they should raise a big red flag.  Why?  Because data integrity issues are bound to crop up as CSPs move vital data from a legacy system to something new.  It’s time for transformation assurance.
  • How can Cable/DSL Internet Providers Meet the Usage-Based Billing Mandate? interview with Ryan Guthrie — The popularity of YouTube, Netflix, and Hulu other video outlets has turned the tables on service profitability for cable/DSL service providers.  Many are moving to usage-based billing, but that largely unprepared for the revenue assurance aspects of this move.  This interview explains the technical challenge and points to solutions in billing, speed caps, and traffic revenue monitoring.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance: How Rural LECs can Recover $284 Million in Revenue Shortfalls interview with Kelly Cannon & Darrell Merschak — Independent rural LECs in the U.S. still rely on the AMA/EMI billing formats for CABS billing, even as that format has proven to be highly inaccurate as a source of inter-carrier records.  This interview includes an analysis and discussion of revenue recovery techniques ILECs can use by leveraging SS7 probes.  Also discussed are billing strategies, traffic dumping threats, and the possible fallout from the FCC’s bill-and-keep mandate.
  • Make Business Assurance Progress Every Day: How to Set Goals, Automate, and Energize Your Team interview with Kathleen Romano — Business assurance (BA) skills have wide applicability outside the revenue assurance and fraud mangement domains.  In this article, a telecom executive explains how she’s applying her BA skills in the Payments area.  In addition to discussing the key operational challenges in Payments, the interview also provides keen insights on setting goals in business assurance, leading a team, and making critical decisions.
  • Webinar: Rolling Out LTE?  How to Prevent Revenue Leakage and Fraud webinar featuring Amir Gefen & Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfully plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This 43-minute on-demand webinar lays out a strategy for how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • Webinar: Quest for the Next Revenue Assurance City of Gold — A Consultant’s Guide to Hidden RA Treasure webinar featuring Jim Marsh & Curtis Mills — In this 32-minute, fully indexed webinar, two North American consultants explain why revenue assurance remains one of smartest business investments a service provider can make.  Topics include: 1) marrying great software with expert knowledge/experience; 2) strategies for bringing an RA program up to date especially as new products are rolled out; 3) likely leakage areas to investigate; 4) applying RA-honed skills to benefit marketing and customer analytics; and 5) the biggest RA mistakes operators make.
  • LTE Rollout: Make it a Smashing Success with Risk Assessment, Controls, and Marketing Offer Analytics by Gadi Solotorevsky — LTE brings splendid new capabilities to mobile users.  But like 2G and 3G deployments before, operators can only make money if they successfuly plan, coordinate, deploy fast, and pay attention to pricing plans and the customer experience.  This article lays out a 3-phase tactical guide on  how revenue analytics professionals can add value in LTE service risk assessment, controls, and marketing offer analytics.
  • RA Prevention: How to Manage Revenue Risks and Communicate RA’s Value to Senior Execs by Shaul Moav — The era of revenue assurance prevention and risk assessment is here.  Several of the mature operators of the world have developed their own methodologies and tools.  Using firefighting and fire prevention as a metaphor, the article details a new commercial software approach explaining the goals, method of risk evaluation, and senior executive dashboards developed for the process.
  • Precision Clockworks: How Revenue Assurance Synchronizes with the Business at Swisscom interview with Marco Pollinger — An expert revenue assurance department is one whose work dovetails well with the lines of businesses it supports.  In this interview you’ll learn how Swisscom manages its revenue assurance function for maximum effect.  The article discusses: the operator’s innovative RA organization, the screening and RA approval of new services, its pre-production bill audits, and its coordination with corporate risk management.
  • Versatile, Portable & Corrections-Savvy: Quest for the Swiss Army Knife of Revenue Assurance Software by Mark Yelland — Revenue assurance maturity models are not cast in stone.  Since  best practices will change over time, it’s healthy to explore moving maturity models forward.  For example, great gains have been made in leakage detection, but RA corrections has been harder to master.  The author dreams about seven functions that should ideally come together in a single all-purpose revenue assurance software tool.
  • Bringing Strategic Planning & Value Engineering to Revenue Assurance interview with Maged Fawzy — Engineering and architectural techniques have a role in revenue assurance.  This interview with a top Egyptian RA consultant explains how continuous risk assessment and long range — yet flexible — RA planning can sharpen a carrier’s RA program and lead to better use of revenue assurance software and integration services.
  • Forensic Fossils: Is Your Revenue Assurance Shop Fit for Display at a Natural History Museum? interview with Jim Marsh — Without the continuous guiding light of seasoned revenue assurance leaders, even the best teams of RA professionals, technology, and business processes can fossilize and lose their vitality.
  • Revenue Assurance: The Magical Market Cap Multiplier by Van Howard & Curtis Mills — Many operators today consider revenue assurance yesterday’s opportunity.  But this article shows why significant revenue and cost leakage can still go undetected, even in companies with dedicated RA departments.  Also discussed are the benefits of a broader or more “forensic” approach to revenue assurance, an approach that boosts the bottom line regardless of the automated tools already in place.
  • From Risk to Robust: Turning the Big Picture Into a Real Agenda for Change in Telecoms by Eric Priezkalns — Inspired by a Financial Times article written by Nassim Taleb, author of “The Black Swan”, here is an insightful and entertaining primer on telecom risk management.  The article takes ten risk management lessons from Taleb and applies them specifically to the communications industry.  You’ll learn about the value of small scale trials, organization accountability, cures for a blame culture, incentives that work, the power of simplicity, and more.
  • Synthesizing the Telecom Business Assurance Practice With the Analytics World by Dan Baker — Business assurance is a wrapper term that allows you to draw a circle around various telecom assurance, control, and optimization activities.  This article maps business assurance as a subset of telecom analytics, constrasting it with marketing analytics while a diagram shows where biz assurance fits in the larger B/OSS world.
  • CABS Revenue Assurance Disputes: May the Carrier With the Best Data Win by Cheryl Smith Rardin & David West — Revenue assurance innovation is far easier when partners cooperate to make it happen.  This articles shows how a U.S. operator, software vendor, and consultant teamed to develop a breakthrough in Carrier Access Billing (CABS) assurance.  Learn about: the dispute resolution data gap that needed to be filled, the partnering strategy, the implementation challenges, and payback results.
  • Revenue Assurance vs.  Business Assurance: Who’s the Rightful King of Controls Software? interview with SÚrgio Luis Silvestre — Business controls software, originally developed for RA, is finding application in other areas of the business such as internal audit, collections, security and risk management.  This article argues that “business assurance” is the best term to describe this broader set of  controls software that can find a home in numerous departments or functions of a CSP’s business.
  • PwC on the Business of Revenue Assurance Consulting & Mentoring interview with Tim Banks & Dan Stevens — Revenue assurance consulting firms offer a broad range of services to clients these days.  The article explains the practice of mentoring RA mangers and providing a CFO with visibility on the status of an operator’s business controls.  Perspective is also offered on the value of RA software and the opportunity to broaden the RA practice scope.
  • Robots for Hire: Verifying Accuracy In the Age of Complex Mobile Billing/Charging interview with Xavier Lesage — As real-time charging and complex lifestyle calling plans gain credence across the globe in wireless, billing quality issues will rise in importance.  This article discusses a unique managed services approach to invoice testing and roaming fraud protection that checks results against advertised or published source data for the utmost accuracy.
  • Ericsson: Revenue Assurance Consulting With an NGN Flavor interview with Thomas Steagall — Helping operators detect billing and provisioning problem is merely table stakes in the RA services business these days.  The article discuss why operators need to ramp up their RA function with service experience and group-wide financial health monitoring.  Advise is also offered on: key RA maturity questions, risk-and-reward contracts, and how to extract greater value from software investments.
  • Do-It-Yourself RA for Small Operators and MVNOs interview with Mark Yelland — Budget-minded small operators and MVNOs are no longer hamstrung in RA capability anymore.  This article offers high-leverage strategies for operators who cannot afford expensive RA software tools.  With  data access, brains, and a DIY philosophy, any small operator can map a  path to greater RA savings, maturity, and program growth.
  • Revenue Assurance Maturity: Report From the Arena interview with Eric Nelson — Revenue assurance maturity can‘t be easily computed.  How do you  compare the KPIs of Comcast billing with that of mobile money RA in Western Africa?  Even still, this article offers some universal RA wisdom from a straight-shooting veteran of carriers large and small.  Topics discussed include: dashboard or process, COTS vs. inhouse solutions, and tips on gaining internal support for the RA practice.
  • Revenue Assurance: Where Do We Go from Here? by Rob Mattison — By leveraging a good core understanding of telco technologies, operations and revenue management activities, RA professionals are applying their knowledge in areas such as Margin Assurance, Market Assurance, Revenue Engineering, and Revenue Governance.  This article lays out some useful definitions of the many facets of business and revenue assurance.